Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : NIFTY NINE IN NINETY NINE PLUS ONE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WWS who wrote (489)	4/18/1999 9:28:00 AM
From: LLCF	Respond to of 613

<and thus can monitor their progress as a natural byproduct of my normal daily routine.> Yes, classic Peter Lynch.... just make sure you employ the rest of Lynch's methods! DAK

To: WWS who wrote (489)	4/19/1999 12:39:00 AM
From: Mike McFarland	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 613

HAS might not be a bad play...if only because of the yuppie-piling-on effect. The Star Wars effect on stocks had gone through my head, but saw an article which pointed out that Fox is not going to make much of the deal Lucas gave them...and Pepsi had to shell out 2B for the rights to be the official drink. That 2B seems like an awful lot to try and recover through Tacos...and all the while handing out free toys. The Mexican Chihuahua was a much better deal... Hasbro does seem like the best of the bunch. I may diversify into something besides biotech someday too...but I couldn't part with any of my picks for now.