Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (25969)	4/19/1999 10:09:00 PM
From: V$gas.Com	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Alas, Remember When? To: Fred Thornell (22521 ) From: Suzanne Newsome Tuesday, Mar 30 1999 8:26AM ET Reply # of 25969 It is TIME for TSIG to have a shareholders meeting. TSIG is no longer a smoke-and-mirrors BB company. TSIG is a growing, dynamic company that belongs on the NASDAQ. The company is struggling with financing and growth issues. The shareholders need to go to Florida and see the facilities for themselves and hear about the company's vision from Robert Gordon himself. We need to hold a 10K in our hands and hear the questions and discussions in person. Right now, we are victims of our own hype and expectations. We are a bunch of "nervous nellies" desperately searching for the next fix from REW or Marty. If the majority of us had been to Florida, we wouldn't be lying on the floor having a figurative temper tantrum because daytraders sold on the news yesterday. A shareholders' meeting is overdue! Regards, Suzanne Next Previous

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (25969)	4/19/1999 10:54:00 PM
From: tfk	Respond to of 44908

"The accumulated deficit is $38 million. This represents stockholders' money that has been spent. . . consumed, for which there is no offsetting asset. Thirty-eight million dollars of stockholders' money has been vaporized. What does Robert Gordon owe these stockholders?" I would say RG owes shareholders an increased share price so they could get a return on their investment. Don't you see the potential of revenue and profits to come that would make the $38 million deficit pale in comparison? Isn't that why we are investing in TSIG? In addition, this deficit is a result of money spent on past business ventures, not the current business. Since late last year TSIG.com has completely restructured and is now functioning like a new startup Internet company, somewhat similar to VRIO or USWB (these 2 companies may not be good analogies, but they came to mind first). Regards, tfk