SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : CTSL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonyt who wrote (1281)4/21/1999 7:44:00 PM
From: Anaxagoras  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1354
 
<<What is really amazing is how he is consistently wrong ...>>

Simply false. Of course, it all depends on what you mean by "consistently wrong....". With equal vagueness one could maintain that CTSL has been "consistently right". Frankly, I think both statements are silly. He's had some stunning losses and some stunning hits. I have too. How 'bout you?

Anaxagoras



To: tonyt who wrote (1281)4/22/1999 1:59:00 PM
From: BelowTheCrowd  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1354
 
Realistically, the arguement on QCOM was always that "their technology is more expensive, and doesn't justify the cost." One might argue that the situation has changed sufficiently that CDMA is now looking like the ONLY good long term alternative regardless of cost, and costs are dropping.

Agreements to incorporate QCOM's CDMA into the next GSM protocol make it's adoption a sure thing worldwide.

mg


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News