To: Andreas Samson who wrote (21113 ) 4/21/1999 10:10:00 PM From: wvalx Respond to of 23519
<<MY COLD ANALYSIS OF THE CC: SHORT VVUS GOING FORWARD -Revenues have fallen sequentially for the sixth straight quarter.>> You're right, this was totally unexpected and wall street always looks at the past when placing a value on a stock. <<-.12 'profit' is the result of one time milestone payments, and therefore not valid in any earnings calculation. VVUS posted a one penny (LOSS) against OPEX.>> Right again, milestones were unexpected and we thought they were going to post a profit w/o them. <<-with the inventory channel filled, they will post wider losses in the upcoming two quarters.>> Again right, but they never said they were going to post a loss in the next 3 quarters. <<-OPEX will increase in the next two quarters, with 'no significant int'l revenues during 2nd and 3rd quarters.'>> <<-specifically, (in addition to R&D) MARKETING expenses will rise, which suggests that a domestic partner is nowhere in sight.>> You're right, they wouldn't even attempt to do any marketing if they had a marketing partner. <<-Spain, Italy and France will not be launched until Fall, which suggests A/Z is taking a cautious approach, and implies something less than total enthusiasm for the product. After all, it's paid for, why wait?>> You're right, launch something right before everyone goes on a holiday, that's the best time to do it. <<-reorders not expected for Germany until 4Q.>> now they are ordering only product for Germany, that's news to me. <<-'our goal for the year, is to break even, including milestone payments.' Ouch. Translation: 'Including our big 4th quarter, we will lose 24 cents a share going forward.' Obviously, PW's estimates are going to have to be cut. >> Right again, they could not post big profits at the expense of R+D, which would be much wiser. <<-OPEX was reduced primarily because 'Cost of goods sold' was down significantly, once again. At first glance, this looks good on a balance sheet, but it's a losing statistic. 'Cost of goods' is down because they are producing (read: selling) less product. On the whole, VVUS remains in the same limbo it enjoyed when it was a $2 stock November-March. Gravity will play a role now. At $5, there will be more money to be had in the next month or two going short rather than staying long. That's my call, anyway. Good luck to all longs.>> Good luck to you to.