SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Roads End who wrote (19041)4/22/1999 4:26:00 PM
From: unclewest  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
steve,
the time line for rmbs is 2002-2003.
i try to keep my on that ball.
unclewest



To: Roads End who wrote (19041)4/22/1999 4:31:00 PM
From: Dave B  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Steve,

I didn't post Earlie's report to spread FUD. I own a b**tload of Rambus. And Earlie posted it on the Big Kahuna board, where it would have had next to no effect at all. I only copied it over as a possible explanation of the action we had already seen, though in hindsight, if the trades were all small, the action was probably not due to comments at an analyst's conference. It's been a topic of discussion before, but I doubt that the SI board has that much pull to cause the sell off that occurred after we went through 60.

My guess is that Zeev started shorting like crazy so that he could win the "low" for the year <g>.

Dave



To: Roads End who wrote (19041)4/22/1999 4:33:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
That's what I think, too. I'm telling you, if there were any truth to INTC backing off on RMBS would have been in the teens weeks ago.....It' too bad though that RMBS is as susceptible to this type of manipulation, goes with the territory though.


bp