SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RJL who wrote (7230)4/23/1999 6:22:00 PM
From: mowa  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14778
 
To All,

This makes me mad as hell!!

PentiumIII - is Big Brother watching?

The PentiumIII processor now expected to be released in March 1999, will
have new features: unique serial number and a "random number generator."
So, what does this mean for the average computer user?

Intel believes this will provide greater security for Internet transactions for the
home user. Intel publicly states that these new features will foster the growth
of electronic commerce and other Internet-based transactions.

The random number generator is intended to work with the current and future
encryption technology to replace software based encryption, which claimed
to be fool-proof by today's standards, may become at-risk to future
software hacking technology, (I am sorry to use the term hacker in this form,
as it is too often overused and misguided). The number generator is intended
to give the user true confirmed encryption for transactions.

It is the second item that I personally find distasteful. In assigning a serial
number to CPUs that will be transmitted during all uses of the Internet as a
signature of the user's machine, each computer/user's Internet activity can be
tracked. Intel believes this provides security for bank transactions, Internet
E-commerce, health care provides and the like in releasing sensitive
information requested by the user. Further Intel reports this will provide a
tool to recover stolen computers, (but only if they are used on the Internet).

Business, governments and anyone else seeking to generate data about
individuals will be able to easily trace each user's activity on the Internet. The
CPU ID number will be sent with each peice of E-mail, extracted when
visiting a web site or any of the myriad of other Internet activities. The
average Internet user's activities will be traced, compiled and huge data bases
contructed with demographics to be sold to marketing firms or
governments. Is this security for the Individual or a means to target more
electronic advertising to the average user? Is this just another means for
governments to garner vast data bases about individual's activities on the
Internet, raw data about each individual? Is this just paranoia or are we
making one more step toward Orwell's oft times referred "Big Brother is
watching?" Is Big Brother really the government or is it the growing control
of the Internet by commercial/business concerns?

Intel quickly points out that the ID number can be disabled, using a feature in
the PC's operating system software. New PCs will be sold with this feature
"switched on" as default. Will switching off the ID number be practical? I
can invision ISPs, domains, back bone providers, web sites and others
requiring the ID number to be enabled to allow access by users. Further, for
the average person computers and the Internet is already too complicated.
They will not even be aware they can switch off the ID number.

The infamous "Clipper chip" technology that was soundly turned down
publicly by Americans as an intrusion into their privacy is quitely being
replaced by Intel's new PentiumIII features. Big Brother is not just watching,
they are activily designing tools to follow you into the future and Intel is
privately providing the Clipper chip features in the new PentiumIII CPUs.
Quietly, the technology Americans refused to allow by law is being added by
Intel.


nospin.com

This is exactly the kind of stuff that makes me rabid anti-Microsoft, the arrogance.

I,m off to try and stir up an AMD "Harware Privacy Campaign".

mowa



To: RJL who wrote (7230)4/23/1999 8:28:00 PM
From: hal jordan  Respond to of 14778
 
Thanks for explaining the differences Rich. I noticed the bus speed of a celeron mb is 60 Mhz as opposed to 100 Mhz on the PII. Would the AGP slot on a Celeron mb completely eliminate the graphics from going over the 66 Mhz bus? Then there should be no big difference from a graphics perspective regarding bus speed.

Hal