SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Bid.com International (BIDS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zima who wrote (25170)4/23/1999 8:31:00 PM
From: Ruyi  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 37507
 
I suggest you do your home work little boy , I've done mine .Ths news paper reported that BII has been charging these losses to promotion unlike Ubid or other auction houses. That is why BII showed a better gross margin .



To: Zima who wrote (25170)4/23/1999 8:39:00 PM
From: Ruyi  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 37507
 
However, Bid.Com has an atypical way of accounting for
some of its losses and expenses. The company's financial reports show that it
places the loss for goods sold below cost under its advertising and promotion
expenses category. According to Bid.Com's 1998 financial report, it cost the
company C$3.52 million to sell goods at below cost last year. This figure is
included in advertising and promotion expenses of C$12.6 million.



To: Zima who wrote (25170)4/23/1999 8:54:00 PM
From: GoNorth  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 37507
 
James, on the basis of BII's reporting it looks like they buy goods at $1.00 and sell them for $1.036 (not factoring in the interesting way the move losses to marketing costs) I guess this is how they do business. BTW do you know of any retail company that has been successful operating on 3.6% gross margins?

>>Dagan has No concept on how BID does Business.