Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MGV who wrote (10670)	4/24/1999 12:53:00 AM
From: Pallisard	Respond to of 27311

Visnic, sometimes I think your only personal asset is good grammar.

To: MGV who wrote (10670)	4/24/1999 10:20:00 AM
From: John Curtis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Mr. Visnic: I don't base my speculative decisions on any aspect of thread hype, or commentary, social or otherwise. I base it solely on my own investigative skills, as well as such pertinent contacts as I can glean. ;-) The key word in the above is S...P...E...C...U...L...A...T...I...O...N. And I must point out the obvious before you go off into a undeserved self-congratulatory rant. Despite the bulls clearly unsubstantiated PUBLIC commentary, AS WELL AS the commentary of such bears as yerself, VLNC has stayed pretty much level(with one brief pulse into the double digits). And I could care less regarding any arguments relating to how other equities have done, as if that's some sort of valid argumentative comparison. I spread monies around a wee few equities, VLNC is merely one of that "few." Don't you? To me this(levelness) indicates BOTH parties have been judged, and found wanting by the "jury" at large. In other words, the silent, lurking majority out there ain't necessarily believing any of it from either side. But one thing is also obvious to me, based solely on my past speculative experiences. And it relates to the aforementioned fact that VLNC has basically been level these past 4 months or so. To me this is a telling fact indicating the future just might be as bright as we gambling bulls project. At least nothing has been determined to conclusively negate it, no? And from my own point of view that future should commence sometime early in the second half of this year. But this is all mere speculation, ain't it? ;-) Don'tcha just love it? John~