SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AT&T -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ibexx who wrote (2204)4/25/1999 1:27:00 PM
From: Robert Scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4298
 
I can't imagine what Bill would gain by putting more money into Comcast/MediaOne - it's too much to pay. T has other motives and Bill simply cannot compete in those areas. In other words for cable & broadband, it's not worth the price but when you throw in the local loop - that's different - and Bill gains far less than T in that arena.



To: Ibexx who wrote (2204)4/25/1999 2:27:00 PM
From: lnkennedy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4298
 
Armstrong is reported to be friends w/ Gates and I'd expect these friends to discuss plans before acting in a public way, or against the plans of the other. I have no clue as to MSFT's active involvement in comcast or any of its myriad of investments, but assuming that it's a passive investor, more interested in the investment to have an inside track on the future of a given industry for its own software purposes, then I'd not expect Gates to come out as the deep pocket for comcast in a bidding war against his friend Armstrong. Isn't MSFT's investment in non-voting shares like comcast was offering UMG? They seem to be the folks w/ control on the top of the agenda; not the kind of family I'd want to partner w/; my money and their control. That's the stuff you can invest in w/o stepping up to fight for. If comcast gets a partner to help w/ big bucks it'll be somebody obvious only in retrospect, I've no clue who presently. lnk