Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (20127)	4/26/1999 9:15:00 AM
From: lorrie coey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

LOL! Out of the sheer goodness of my heart, I will enlighten you further... If a Woman has "hairy-legs", you're threatened cuz She's not performing for you...well j'laylla, I think of you every morning when I get that really close shave that makes my legs smoother than the snot running from your nose! Now, on your irrelevant opinion... as I have clearly stated here before, "marriage" is a CONTRACT of ownership. With that contract, you do have ownership of your "wife's" uterus...you've paid dearly for this, and will continue to do so. Marriage is a legalized, state sanctioned version of the Oldest Profession. So you're in CONTROL! Got that chub now!?!

To: jlallen who wrote (20127)	4/26/1999 10:40:00 AM
From: pezz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

JLA, Unfortunately you did not address my main point which is based on the fact that abortion is an all or nothing situation. If agreement cannot be reached compromise is impossible,no? Can't have a partial abortion can we ? Thus in cases of all or nothing situations the minority position is Irelevant.Clearly the male interest based on personal beliefs and biological interests is far out weighted by the fact that the mother carries the child inside her body even as a part of her body.This makes the male position the minority position. << Marriage is a compact and the best way to break the compact is to have one party making decisions of relative importance without consulting the other. >> Of course in this example neither party is the minority party. After all in most cases your wife is effected equally in your change of jobs. If the case of changing jobs was going from a sewer worker to a business executive and resulted no change of living address, security or other such effects on family life then You could make a case for her opinion being a minority one and not relevant. I'm curious. If your wife were to become pregnant and after much discussion you could not agree to abort or not who's opinion would prevail? pez