Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Flag Resources (FGR.A A) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bernie Koppenhofer who wrote (1087)	4/26/1999 7:51:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4269

I think it may be premature to expect hard questions from soft numbers. What is needed may be a shift to the understanding of the PGMs and their influences by time, geology and bulk tonnages that have been assumed to be economic. Some afterthefact planning just might be needed to be shown to support the conclusions of the assays. Of old, or heavens forbid, a reason for variability of numbers due to some complex set of future and undisclosed current questions. Check and recheck and double check and double blind may be needed to proove the importance of the geology. The past posts were ASSuming much too much on the expected homogeneity of the geology. Afterall, I was once saying these same things here. I have learned that there must be more thought and cross reference before statements can be made. The rules say that they can't say anything that is not verified. I think we have toi wait some more. I saw Canadian Juniors last week with mention of ICP taesting and 30-50 multi e;lement testings, all this talk is new groud up north here and if I may be so bold, IT AIN'T YOUR DADDY's BREAKFAST, ANYMORE! Maybe, the testing, is much more important than we can realize at this time. Slow and Methodical is the key to the PGMs... Chuca

To: Bernie Koppenhofer who wrote (1087)	4/26/1999 8:03:00 PM
From: ali	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4269

Hi Bernie, what "hard"questions would you like ask? At least Tim does not have any shares in flag and would like to jump aboard the flag if he sees the right constellation in the sky.I, for my part either trust or don't.If I don't, I sell, even at a loss.So far I do trust what I heard and keep holding flag,as it is one of the few Canadian jr. exploration co which could make a killing for me in the present tough mining situation.Will have coffee with Murdo tomorrow and ask him a few pertinent questions myself.Flag is in the lucky situation that they are in the same area not only in gold, but have also prime holding for nickel/platinum/palladium just a few miles away and the 2 major mining co.would just love to see us find plenty of nickel ore for their mills close by.The drilling is still going on and never looked more promising than it does now.They should be close to 1000 feet today and have been in disseminated mineralization for 400 feet or more.We just have to wait what the next few days show.Best regards,ali