SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michael L. Voorhees who wrote (15787)4/26/1999 9:31:00 PM
From: QwikSand  Respond to of 64865
 
NTFS is robust, Yah sure. Hot air cometh forth once more.

Well, to be fair here, you have to ask "compared to what". It's ceratinly robust compared to any of the other Microsoft file systems. My own experience has been that NT crashes a lot, but the file system never gets destroyed even so. Somehow or other when you reboot it rolls its log forward, fixes everything up and keeps going. I just haven't lost data using NTFS...as a desktop file system. NTFS isn't as good as any Unix file system, logging or not, as far as performance or robustness goes, and certainly miles below the Unix enterprise file systems (Veritas et. al.). But as a desktop file system, it's great compared to the other Microsoft file systems, which are like high-school computer science projects (that got D's). This is the frustrating thing: Microsoft has trained people to think of garbage as normal software.

Regards,
--QwikSand



To: Michael L. Voorhees who wrote (15787)4/26/1999 11:09:00 PM
From: Stormweaver  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 64865
 
At least the default NT file system doesn't require manual intervent for 1/2 our to repair after a simple power failure.