SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: djane who wrote (4216)4/27/1999 2:26:00 AM
From: John Stichnoth  Respond to of 29987
 
Seems like a canard In any case, from the CC and your and Jon's simutaneous posts, it increasingly seems that G can compete on quality rather than just price.

(Isn't Inmarsat mid-earth orbit--400 millisecond delay?)



To: djane who wrote (4216)4/27/1999 6:19:00 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Respond to of 29987
 
djane, for fixed service, ICO will definitely be a competitor with Globalstar and even for mobile where price is vital - some people will cart a notebook computer around to save the $$$. If there is no ICO, those customers will [mostly] buy Globalstar, or go to GEO systems. The big question is how many customers would be most suited to the low quality but cheap ICO 15,000 km system instead of Globalstar's and how many would rather pay the price for ICO instead of the GEO services where Globalstar can't reach - for example on Easter Island and other remote locations where Globalstar will take quite a few years to reach?

Maurice



To: djane who wrote (4216)4/27/1999 1:48:00 PM
From: Geoff Goodfellow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 29987
 
Dear djane, et al: i didn't buy into Valueman's "severe Inmarsat limitations" discussions. And yes, i am saying Globalstar (and Iridium and ICO) should be worried about Inmarsat Mini-M. However, more importantly, i believe everyone should be worried about the actual demand and demographics for these services, especially given the history of the existing like-services, Inmarsat Mini-M and American Mobile Satellite (AMSC). Having been involved in the wireless & computer industries since before the start of cellular telephone services i have seen all to first hand what happens when these promoted Grand Visions (aka the hopes and desires) of the business building phase are interdicted with the post-launch reality of actual customer signups (or rather, lack there of). My conclusion is the best way to make money here is to Buy early in the concept/pre-launch phase and Sell (and if you have the stomach for it Short) on launch. In closing, i would highly encourage any potential investors in these stocks to throughly understand Inmarsats and AMSC (SKYC:NASDAQ) business, history and (small) customer base. I believe you will find it very indicative of coming attractions in this space(pun not intended). However, only time will tell who is 'right' (and for those you who have invested in these stocks, i hope and would be happy to be 'wrong'). At this point, i believe i have had my say and it is only wise, having stirred the pot this much as I have as a serious doubting Thomas, to return to a lurker/reader status on this thread. On the positive side, i am an absolute self confessed lover of the technology aspects, but just can't get over the hump when it comes to a viable business case. Good luck to all!

Best regards and respect to all,
Geoff Goodfellow