Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Curbstone who wrote (28573)	4/28/1999 6:26:00 AM
From: TShirtPrinter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

OK folks.. let's stop it right now. For the newbies here, I'll tell you JGoren took a day off work, drove many hours one way, sat in on the Erciy/Qcom trials and then reported back to the thread. Surfer Mike will make his ruling soon I am sure, but in the meantime our Wharton School tassle loafer bud has a point. Your screen printer, college drop out, fellow investor, Tony

To: Curbstone who wrote (28573)	4/28/1999 6:55:00 AM
From: JGoren	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Using your third (your first was April 5th) post on this thread to attack me personally in such a juvenile manner is not a smart way to introduce yourself to this thread.

To: Curbstone who wrote (28573)	4/29/1999 1:56:00 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

Another double very Dear Q! Stream paddlers, I am reliably informed that Irwin Jacobs was interviewed by Neil Cavuto on April 21. Irwin Jacobs stated "We still see very, very strong demand for next quarter." Looks like another double-very quarter! That is very, very good news. [I have no idea who Neil Cavuto is]. Mqurice PS: Curbstone, as the official thread monitor I advise that there is a stream in SI called Thread Morons for people who are unduly rude in their posts. I prefer not to simply ignore totally egregious posts and hope that you can adopt a more pleasant turn of phrase. We all have personal idiosyncracies and even deficiencies, but there is no point in trying to give people our opinion about their personal defects. Calling somebody names like that isn't much use. So, before the stream gets ugly and muddy, how about a bit of respect for other people? Especially since you haven't contributed anything here. It's a bit like walking into somebody's living room and abusing them.