Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: V$gas.Com who wrote (26998)	4/28/1999 10:00:00 AM
From: Sam LBI nj	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

post 27000!!!! GO TSIG!!! Sam.com

To: V$gas.Com who wrote (26998)	4/28/1999 10:03:00 AM
From: The Swordsman	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 44908

V$gas, since your acting as the spokesperson for Mr. Gordon, it's apparent that you do not have an answer. Pretty much what some of us expected. While I won't do tit-for-tat I'll try to keep this question infront of the thread until someone has an answer besides the obvious. Once we determine Mr. Gordon's motives for hijacking these shares from the shareholders then and only then can balanced decisions be made about the investment value of TSIG. While I'm still a fan of the plan, and it's really Mr. Hwangs plan, look at www.TSIG.com, but as long as the wrong jockey is in the saddle and he's working with a stacked board there's too many questions that because of history don't add up. Now for the moment can you answer the question? Meanwhile, I still haven't gotten your answer to the very serious question that I posed in that post. It was not rhetorical. Why did Mr. Gordon first run the shares through his bank account for a whopping personal financial gain before lending the proceeds back to the company at such usurious and egregious rates? After all he had just lost the company's shareholders more than $25,000,000 in equity, more than $1 per share at the time, on sales of less than $3,000,000 in two years. This latest plan, really J Hwang's plan wasn't even a glimmer on the horizon at the time of the share hijacking. So please don't tell us he was rewarding himself for performance. Since you have appointed yourself Mr. Gordon's defender-of-actions, please enlighten us to the factual as opposed to the rhetorical rational for this apparent continued and ongoing activity. Unless of course you bring us news this morning that Mr. Gordon has made his loan agreement to the company null & void. Anxiously awaiting your answer and straining to hold these leashes.... SC