SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Xin Net Technologies - BB: XNET - The Next Internet Stock? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FFNEODOC who wrote (1248)4/28/1999 5:10:00 PM
From: praguepivo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1593
 
ahoj!!

As always, good post Frank. I am interested, hypothetically of course,
if AOL ( or ? )were to attempt to acquire XNET how would that effect
us....how would they go about it and what say would we as shareholders
have?

TIA
pivo



To: FFNEODOC who wrote (1248)4/28/1999 5:19:00 PM
From: pat pasquale  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1593
 
FF; i agree with your thinking and of course I am biased

with 15K of the stock...
hopefully this 3-3/4 price is starting to form a little higher base than the 3 3-1/4 range...
i have another ? though..

all the talk about filing in early May for a Nasdaq listing..say they do file by mid-May what is the procedure and give or take a time frame for an answer and if granted how long then before a listing
takes place?
thanks and good luck on your trades
pp



To: FFNEODOC who wrote (1248)4/29/1999 7:27:00 AM
From: Tom_H_68  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1593
 
My opinion -

I would like to play devils advocate. Do not misinterpret this post, I am a share holder and I intend to hold long, but I think (but would like to believe otherwise) that the AOL buy-out discussion is EXTREMELY premature and somewhat reckless.

First, I believe that the Chinese government would have no problem granting a license to a billion dollar ISP (AOL) for the right amount of money and a small % of the revenues.

Second, (I believe) XNET is not in enough cities (yet) to provide the type of service that a company like AOL would want to buy. Even if AOL bought XNET, wouldn't AOL need to apply for licenses' to expand into other cities any way? Isn't this what they would like to avoid? If I were making decisions for AOL I would wait for a greater audience or find another company that has a larger audience. Why not let the indigenous ISP's do the leg-work to get "spread around" before buying?

I just think that a buy-out is a ways off and I would hate to get peoples hopes up prematurely.

Again - I am long in/on XNET and would love to see a press release to prove me wrong but this is a big issue to just be throwing it around. Be careful and responsible about your posts.

tom