Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : INTEL TRADER -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jurgen Trautmann who wrote (6055)	4/29/1999 10:58:00 AM
From: Jurgen Trautmann	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11051

I was asked whether I accept "good intentions" from everybody. (lately answering a question of Marc) After considering a few days, reading a lot about this region, that what's happening and all the speaches about the war, I can say: No, I don't believe in "good intentions" as motif for the US-intervention in Serbia. By far more probable seem to me the following reasons: 1) I learned from Bill Gates, that new military geografic-logistic-systems have been needed to test under realistic conditions... 2) I understand that US-salesman now are travelling with new movies from Kosovo(!!!), offering new weapon-systems f.e. in China... 3) I realized that the usual well known US-greed for crude must tolerate: - that a NATO-partner (!!!) forced 4 million Kurds to leave their home - that a NATO-partner has killed more than 30000 people. - but not that a independent, badly to control small nation nearby like Serbia could destabilize a region with probably 10 billion tons crude in Central-Asia. 4) That for the same NATO-people who "smiling" kill a lot of innocent people as "colateral damages" a moralic barrier against killing Milosevic exist - "he's one of us".