Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (6094)	4/29/1999 11:52:00 PM
From: robnhood	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

It did---- cross your mind... No one was really offended by Clinton's actions as far as Monica was concerned, I don't think so... Maybe my better judgement would have stopped me, but only for societies reasons and perhaps not my instinct... Good grief, he wore the tie she gave him.. He liked her, and he liked her adoration which she most obviously had/has...JMO

To: Neocon who wrote (6094)	4/30/1999 8:44:00 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 17770

Suppose that an older sister of one of those cutie-pies had come along on the trip, say a 22 year old. She was also a cutie-pie and very friendly and flirtatious with you. Suppose also that she came to your room alone to talk flirtatiously with you one evening and eventually raised her skirt to show you her panties. Any man would be tempted and lots and lots would give in to the temptation right then and there. And once you gave in to temptation you'd be "in a relationship" of a sort with her whether you had really wanted that in the first place. She'd have you by the short hairs so to speak. Clinton shouldn't have done what he did, but it's not hard to understand the how and why.