Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (10896)	4/30/1999 1:53:00 AM
From: Rich Wolf	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Yep, it's 'last word larry'. Can't answer the questions, though. (eom)

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (10896)	4/30/1999 2:06:00 PM
From: Bob Childers	Respond to of 27311

Excuse me, Larry, but you are hyperventilating over this appeals court ruling. The court only decided one thing: that the 1993 Forbes article did not claim a fraud at VLNC. That's all. The significance is it's publication did not start the clock on the one year window during which a legal challenge must be made after public release of information that a fraud may have taken place. In other words, the lower court was incorrect in its judgement that the cutoff date for filing the suit was one year after publication in Forbes, which plaintiffs had missed. That is it. It is of no significance on the merits. Best of investing to the longs. Astute traders have been making money on the bounce for months. It's our turn soon Bob