Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (36367)	4/30/1999 3:41:00 PM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 108807

It was silly and pointlessly snippy of FT, of whom I expect better.

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (36367)	4/30/1999 3:46:00 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 108807

Yes, I agree, it is an attack on you, and not a logical defense of a position. But I understood the fallacy of argumentum ad hominem to be something more than that. I thought that it was a way of attacking one's opponent in order to show that his argument is wrong. FT just attacked you as a person, without reference to your argument. Here are a couple of examples in a little logic book I had handy: "The so-called theories of Einstein are merely the ravings of a mind polluted with liberal, democratic nonsense which is utterly unacceptable to German men of science." "The theory of a relativistic universe is the hostile work of the agents of facism. It is the revolting propaganda of a moribund, counterrevolutionary ideology." The first, by the way, is from a Nazi exponent of "Nordic Science," the second from a Soviet astronomical journal. Both from 1940.