Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E'Lane who wrote (42846)	4/30/1999 11:23:00 PM
From: Little Engine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Honestly, E, I don't see what is so "right" about that post... It can't seem to get the simplest facts straight. It accuses Janice of bashing INFE, DGIV, and SGNC... if she posted four messages between those three boards over the past year, I'd be very surprised. The stock prices of INFE and DGIV went down because their CEO's never came through on their constant promises to issue financials, plain and simple. SGNC was brought down by "bashers"? Oh please.. the company is a total joke. Every year they issue reports that they are bringing in no revenues and that their products haven't been approved yet. Their most recent release stated that they are deeply in debt and may not be a going concern much longer. Would you want to hold on to such a stock? I love it when the hypesters, out to make a quick buck, project their morals onto everyone else... "well, I'm out to rip people off, so they must be too." You really agree with the post's claim that Janice, et. al., "never prove anything"? Their DD on MTEI was remarkable, as well as their work on AZNT (which Janice picked up on when she was invited by the hypesters onto the thread)... to give only two examples. As far as CYGS goes (a company going from shrimp farming to splitting DNA, I'm sure it's perfectly legit), I think this post says it all: #reply-5277908

To: E'Lane who wrote (42846)	5/1/1999 5:07:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 50264

Do you know who Dave Gore is? A two-bit hypester; check his recent posts. Around the time he wrote the idiotic and self-serving message you cite, Graystone did some excellent DD on him: #reply-5185218 That's one of the things we find frustrating: our critics are willing to cite any source, however doubtful, as long as it can be construed to show us in a bad light; and they're willing to buy any conspiratorial garbage thrown at them, no matter how absurd. I read the responses to that post on the MDIN thread. All favorable. No wonder we eventually lose our patience and call these people fools.