SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Yousef who wrote (56921)5/1/1999 10:21:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 1573898
 
RE:"Yes Paul, I do get E-mails thanking me for my technical posts on IC
processing."....

You haven't put up a decent technical post for years. You've just relegated yourself to snide remarks. Sad, really. You used to be really helpful.

Jim



To: Yousef who wrote (56921)5/1/1999 10:23:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573898
 
Yousef - Re: "Ialso get thanks for "debunking" the AMD HYPE on this thread."

I wonder how many "Thank Yous" Mc Mannic received for telling some suckers that the mighty K7 was in production last December, so those suckers bought in on AMD at $30 - right when McMannic DUMPED his AMD shares ?

I'll bet he gets tons of "Thank Yous" for that kind of contribution.

Paul



To: Yousef who wrote (56921)5/1/1999 9:11:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573898
 
Re: "I do get E-mails thanking me for my technical posts on IC processing. People love to learn about the technology that they are investing in ... I also get thanks for "debunking" the AMD HYPE on this thread."

Really? I get lots of emails thanking me, too. A lot of process engineers are constantly emailing me telling me to keep up the good work pointing out how confused you are, in particular. I suspect I'll get even more when the K7 is intro'd at 600 MHz.

I understand that Intel is upset that some of their "consultants" told them that AMD would never make it past 300 MHz on their existing processes--can you confirm whether or not this is true?

Kevin