Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bonnie Bear who wrote (37861)	5/2/1999 9:20:00 PM
From: accountclosed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

I believe that your statement Now 1) was a -g- if that wasn't obvious is disingenuous. Your original post Message 8684529 was directed to Fleck. He responded my answers would be no,no and no. techstocks.com To which you countered so where is the money coming from?http://www.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/s-6780/reply-54440 He said who knows?the whole nation is speculating in stocks techstocks.com In a sidebar John Koligman raised a possible Fleck/gates issue techstocks.com to which you responded: no wonder fleck won't talk about bill! techstocks.com and i stated Fleck doesn't hold back what he thinks. I disagree with both the original post about msft and this one. you came back with neither do I. It's evident that msft and the nas derivatives market is the 60 DDD teat the brokers suck on to keep them in business, bill gates is the cult leader for the money junkies who will die without their "leader". . techstocks.com ==== Your original post is hardly a <g> post. Not only no <g>'s appear in it...It has extended follow up...including you insulting Fleck...I challenged you and you didn't back down.