Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MDMI - Italian Bakery Extraordinaire! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Old Stock Collector who wrote (2605)	5/4/1999 9:12:00 AM
From: DuGen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3584

So we've had a big jump and a slow start. It's beginning to look like MDMI and their web alliances are finally getting their strategies together. A big sigh of relief. I'm not worried just impatient. Let's get the ball rolling, start those engines, hoist that sail... or should it be sale. DuGen

To: Old Stock Collector who wrote (2605)	5/4/1999 12:10:00 PM
From: Marc Stager	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3584

Sunday night, May 2, I sent this e-mail to La Guardia. ========================================================= Attention Phil Hernandez Phil: Your firm was engaged by Massimo Da Milano to do their Investor Relations. When I first called, I left a message. You got back to me and told me that it was a slow week due to the Easter holiday and everyone was out, your phones were very busy with calls about MDMI and SETO, and things would settle down the following week. The following week, and every day since then, same thing. Nobody picks up the phone. Now there are numerous complaints that you don't return calls or e-mail. In - message # 2585 Richard Nisbet wrote: "...For the record -- I mailed them before 8 a.m. on Thurs. Its now 4:30 a.m. Saturday EST. The least they can do for investors who have concerns is to send off a general email saying something like... "...Thanks for emailing us, we looked at your list of suggestions and will speak to Mr. Verrill about these matters...and will keep you informed when we get a reply....' That's not too hard...when I call IR at FSON they return calls, they answer emails, and their IR guy Price is eager to answer investors' questions and I've called him at least 6 times." For what it's worth, that Silicon Investor site - techstocks.com - is an important means of communication by and to Massimo's stockholders who, collectively, own over 5,000,000 shares. a good portion of the (extremely optimistic) float. I'm sure Dana Verrill will let you use MDMI's password for you to log on and post as well as read messages. Get on the ball and start returning your e-mail and calls. We need you to do a good job for MDMI or it will sink right back into the single digit doldrums where it was before Verrill signed you on. Please. At least get back to Richard with answers to some very important question. And damnit, get a receptionist to take your calls - and be at your post to field questions - that is your job. That answering machine during business hours is an insult. ___________________ Marc Stager ===================================================== Since then, Referring to the questions he e-mailed LG on April 29, message 2562 Richard wrote: "Its now Monday, May 3 10:19 p.m. still no response to ME. ("ME was in caps because LG did respond to someone else, see below...) Hernandez's response to Old Stock Collector: "...If you will PLEASE leave a message with your number and a good time to call, I promise it will be returned, we hope to have a live person to answer phones at our new offices in the next 15-30 days, I do apologize for the inconvenience." It doesn't take a month to move an office. Medi-Media, a large Medical PR agency moved one of their offices from Manhattan to Teterboro N.J. in one weekend. They were back up and running at full speed by mid week and never stopped answering their phones. LG has been using the "we're moving" excuse for over a week and expect us to buy it for another two to four more. I e-mailed LG last week asking them to correct a small but annoying error in the MDMI profile; when you bring up the profile, it has the title "SETO". Very simple to fix but nothing's been done about it. Verrill tells me he's happy with the job they're doing. If their job is "Investor Relations", this investor doesn't agree. If anyone here is satisfied with the job this organization is doing, I'd like to see your comments. Maybe I'm wrong. ________________________________ Marc Stager

To: Old Stock Collector who wrote (2605)	5/5/1999 1:33:00 AM
From: Old Stock Collector	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3584

* All: If You Must Sell Some Shares or Not Do This * Since we all together own the FLOAT. We can control the Market for MDMI causing the MM to be short by having less sellers at the MM price or if not short at least when news comes out they wont have the shares as cheap as they wanted. Here is a tip for us to try. Use: Limit Orders !!!!!!!!!! A must!!!!!!!! Never use Market Orders in a fast moving stock unless you want to get raped of your CASH. Walk the BID up by Doing a GTC (Good Till Cancel) Set your price anywhere above the ASK say 25% to 50% You can do this even if you don't really need to sell but if you do sell even a little bit of your holdings a 25% to 50% profit is good. I wouldn't do this if you paid 25% - 50% more than the ASK causing you to take a loss. The stock is then higher for the rest of your holdings. By doing this the small investor can help the stock move up. If it doesn't go up & we all stick to this plan then we know the Market Makers are the ones trading back & forth making it look like selling. BTW: If the MM can have a 25% spread between the BID & ASK then we should do this above the ASK to make them pay more when they want the shares back!!!!!!!! Don't get me wrong here I'm not saying to sell!!!! I paid as low as .025 & still holding on I only have an order in to sell a very tiny amount just in case the MM wants my shares at my price taking the stock up in value.