SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : America On-Line (AOL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LOGAN12 who wrote (14843)5/5/1999 11:03:00 AM
From: Joe S Pack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41369
 
Yes,
MSFT is buying into ATT to get their CE stuff used by ATT.
It is a good move but need to see how it will come out in the end.
It seems ATT was leaning on SUN's technology and MSFT found that
paying a few billion dollar to get the business is not bad idea.
But of ocurse it is up to ATT to decide whether it will be worth
using windows CE on technical basis.

-Nat



To: LOGAN12 who wrote (14843)5/5/1999 11:03:00 AM
From: TraderC  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 41369
 
AOL's fair value is 62, for a PE of around 100.
Its current PE ratio of 189 is unsustainable.

The AT&T deal is really going to make people
rethink AOL's long-term outlook.



To: LOGAN12 who wrote (14843)5/5/1999 11:12:00 AM
From: Tunica Albuginea  Respond to of 41369
 
LOGAN12, MSFT will invest ~ 5 bill in AT&T, MSFT is interested in selling TV set top boxes. However various cable cos have refused to give MSFT ~ 1 year ago an exclusive on their their technology to prevent MSFT from forming another monopoly. So web TV is an open standard now.
Foe everybody on this thread asking " we/AT&T now have a monopoly" in cable I can reassure that congress won't let that happen. If not congress certainly the marketplace. Cable is too important, and every Tom Dick and Harry will be in it, certainly the baby bells.
Anyway cable is growing at a snail's pace. By then AOL will be miles ahead at superspeed. Leave it to Steve,

TA

TA



To: LOGAN12 who wrote (14843)5/5/1999 11:14:00 AM
From: Elliot Puritz  Respond to of 41369
 
If such wasn't stated, analyst at Legg Mason ( hope I am correct ) said AOL was much over valued...he stated he was a seller of the stock. At valuations that the market was projecting, the company would have had a valuation approaching that of GE...Suppose such is an explanation for some of the decrease and selling pressure. Of course, suspect he completed his selling before he said he was doing so...wonder if he had any PUTS?