Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : coastal caribbean (cco@) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (804)	5/5/1999 1:30:00 PM
From: Edwin S. Fujinaka	Respond to of 4686

Wow, quick response! I was told that the oral arguments are not expected to amount to much. Sometimes the Courts just dispense with the oral arguments or they are just perfunctory and brief. Anyway, I don't think we can expect any fireworks on May 12th. After that, it'll be just another couple of months of waiting for the Appeals Court Ruling. As someone once said, "Following this case is like watching the grass grow." <G>.

To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (804)	5/5/1999 1:30:00 PM
From: andy harrison	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4686

Most of you will recall that prior to the Mary Clarke decision there was some serious accumulation of CCO stock. This was apparently a gamble that I would assume one broker was willing to take. The decision was going to be favorable and the stock would rally or the news would be bad and the stock would slump. The news was favorable and the stock moved to $4. At that point a BIG seller came in and proceeded to sell what I believe was a newly aquired position and made a nice trade. Lets hope that if it is the same party doing the same thing this time that if the news is again favorable that he/she lets the stock run much higher this time. (FROM MY LIPS TO GODS EARS!!!!)