To: blankmind who wrote (22235 ) 5/7/1999 2:28:00 AM From: Andy Thomas Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
From an article in the puget sound computer user on graphics machines. In closing, the author writes: "In the meantime, I'll be waiting for that one graphics application that will transform Linux from a Windows-hater's refuge to a credible alternative OS for artists, designers and photographers." I'm not sure the shells available under Linux are "seamless" and easy-to-use. This isn't to say that Windows is optimal, just that there probably isn't anything better at this time. On the other hand I understand that the graphics for Titanic were made on a Linux machine so there must be some graphics apps for Linux already. If and when Linux gets an easier-to-use shell, it will make inroads in the consumer market. If the move away from Windows is to happen, the alternative will have to be "8 times better;" at least that's what Gilder says about replacings technological standards in "Microcosm." As a side note, he said that the 60008 was much better than the 8088, but not 8x better. In designing the first PC, IBM went with the standard even though the alternative was better. So at some point there will be a new breakthrough in OS/interface/device technology. We can see this already with smart phones and the like. The question is whether/how much MSFT will profit from it. What kind of new revenue can MSFT expect from the AT&T deal? I've heard that ENRON is really the company to bet on in the bandwidth wars. If the power companies provide cheap connectivity over the grid, where will that leave the cable providers like AT&T/MSFT? My understanding is that when you get a bunch of users on a cable line, the bandwidth isn't that great. As for putting WinCE in the set-top boxes: My cable already works fine. Can we expect bugs in Windows for Cable? FWIW Andy