SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Corel Corp. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scott Volmar who wrote (6608)5/6/1999 12:52:00 PM
From: Frank Ferrari  Respond to of 9798
 
Scott,

You are not suggesting that it would be appropriate for Corel senior management to become proactive are you? That might put an end to this 24 month 'buying opportunity' that we are mired in. <g>

Cheers
Frank



To: Scott Volmar who wrote (6608)5/6/1999 1:30:00 PM
From: Picanoc  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9798
 
Corel is taking exactly those steps. Take a look at the images they are offering now - not many 'people pics' left. The problem is twofold - first, the existing 'installed base' of images includes problematic ones, obviously, and some of those chickens are coming home to roost. Current practice has no bearing on thoses cases.

The second is even more intractable, but apporaches the limits of any liability. The complaint brought in Florida clearly states that the photographer misappropriated the images - if he misrepresents his ownership, Corel's exposure is minimal, though present. Given the fact that 'models' are not the brightest people to begin with and are often young, there are going to be cases where models sign over rights with no idea that is what they have done. WHen they take umbrage with that later, they look to the money.

That doesn't appear to be the case in the Florida action, but the fault is clearly the photographer's. Corel may bear some responsibility for ensuring the intellectual property rights are legitimate, but fraud is fraud.