SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GVTucker who wrote (80545)5/7/1999 12:20:00 PM
From: L. Adam Latham  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
GVTucker:

Re: Intel has been a poor performer for almost two years now, especially so when compared to the overall market.

What market are you looking at? Intel's stock price rose 68.8% in 1998, had a 2-year annualized increase of 35.6% from 1997-1998, and a 3-year annualized increase of 61% annualized increase from 1996-1998. Which overall market performed better than this?

You can pick and choose any dates you want for any company and show poor performance, but 1, 2, and 3 year (maybe 5 and 10 also) compounded annual returns are what most people look at (and what mutual funds routinely publish).

Adam



To: GVTucker who wrote (80545)5/7/1999 12:39:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
GV - Re: "No, he didn't. 102 in July '97 to 119 now, or split adjusted, 51 to 59 and change. Intel has been a poor performer for almost two years now"

Now there you go again - using the WRONG INFORMATION - and cherry picking the WRONG INFORMATION to suit your agenda.

Intel reached $102 (non-split adjusted) BRIEFLY for A FEW HOURS in August 1997 - so WHY CHOOSE THAT DAMN PRICE as the basis for your asinine comparison?

Why didn't you choose the LOWEST PRICE for Intel in 1997?

Wouldn't fit your agenda - would it?

In May of 1997, Intel was trading at $40 - split adjusted - and at TODAY's PRICE of $61 5/16, Intel is UP 53% from its level TWO YEARS AGO ! .

That's UP about 26% per year and that's PRETTY DAMN GOOD - no matter what cock-n-bull-shit number you pull out of your derriere.

Paul



To: GVTucker who wrote (80545)5/7/1999 1:01:00 PM
From: Tushar Patel  Respond to of 186894
 
Why focus on "almost two years"? Lets look at the exact 2 year performance.

INTC closed at (split adjusted) 38 31/32 on 5/7/97
INTC closed at 61 on 5/6/99

That is over 56% total return over 2 years. Not too shabby.

Tushar Patel