SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Process Boy who wrote (57598)5/7/1999 3:29:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571911
 
PB,

"These are competing technologies, that are not redundant."

Fab 30 has been designed from the ground up for Cu. For AMD to bring up a Cu process at Fab 25, it would require material changes to the facility in a way that Al to Al process transition does not.

Since Intel's current Al fabs are similar to fab 25, I'm guessing that at some point Intel will have both Cu and Al processes running at the same feature size.

Kevin



To: Process Boy who wrote (57598)5/7/1999 3:29:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571911
 
Re: "Kevin, Intel is transitioning to .18 on Al (and Cu, for that matter)"

PB, did you mean to say Intel is now transitioning to Cu on 858?

EP



To: Process Boy who wrote (57598)5/7/1999 10:39:00 PM
From: TGPTNDR  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571911
 
PB Re: <Intel is transitioning to .18 on Al (and Cu, for that matter)one time and sticking to it across all fabs.>

That strikes me as being extremely dangerous, though I'm no Process Boy, but I thought there are serious contamination concerns involved with mixing al & cu manufacturing in the same plant. Please teach me.

tgptndr