SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zia Sun(zsun) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: trader14U who wrote (1594)5/8/1999 12:18:00 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 10354
 
Sponsored by The Alexander Law Firm.

CQMT - CHEQUEMATE INTL INC "The real Alpha"
"The remaining AlphaStar and AlphaStar Television assets, including the Milton, Ont., and Oxford, Conn., uplink stations, and real estate, manufacturing facilities, and the inventory of set-top decoder boxes and antennas, will be offered for sale by the receiver and AlphaStar Television over the next few weeks, Ernst & Young said."

Tee-Comm Electronics Inc.
TSE: ''TEN'' NASDAQ: ''TENXF''

AlphaStar signs off in latest satellite setback

AlphaStar signs off in latest satellite setback
Thursday, August 7, 1997
By Geoffrey Rowan
The Globe and Mail
At 3 a.m. today, the television screens of subscribers to Canada's first direct-to-home TV service, AlphaStar Canada Inc., went blank, ending a sorry chapter in the competition to bring satellite TV to Canadians.

"We had until Aug. 5 to come up with a buyer for all the [AlphaStar] assets," said Brian Denega, senior vice-president for Ernst & Young, the receiver for the now defunct company.

"We attempted to run a process that was exhaustive and sought bids from anybody who wished to buy it as a going concern and keep it alive," Mr. Denega said, "but there were no bids."

AlphaStar had about 7,000 subscribers in Canada, and about 60,000 in the United States, where it did business as a subsidiary of Tee-Comm Electronics Inc. of Milton, Ont., under the name of AlphaStar Television Networks Inc.

AlphaStar Television sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on May 27. AlphaStar's parent, Tee-Comm, went into receivership June 4, never recovering from a break with Canada's original satellite television consortium, ExpressVu Inc. Expressvu has yet to launch a service but says it will this September.

AlphaStar subscribers continued receiving TV signals, even as the Canadian receiver and U.S. courts tried to find a buyer who would keep the service running.

The lack of any bid for AlphaStar and AlphaStar Television, based in Stamford, Conn., by the Aug. 5 deadline triggered another deal.

Now, Loral Space & Communications Ltd., a unit of New York's Loral Corp., will buy back satellite transponders that it leased to AlphaStar Television on its Telstar 402R and Telstar 5 satellites, receiver Ernst & Young said.

The Loral buyback agreement calls for a transfer of value to AlphaStar of $8.7-million (U.S.), including a cash component of $5-million, plus a share of the profit earned by Loral through its re-leasing of the Telstar 5 satellite transponders to other companies.

AlphaStar Television will receive between 35 and 50 per cent of any such future profit, depending on the average contract term of the new leases entered between Loral and other companies.

Ernst & Young said the agreement also entitles Loral to be paid $7.3-million under a letter of credit held by it in satisfaction of AlphaStar's rent arrears to Loral.

The remaining AlphaStar and AlphaStar Television assets, including the Milton, Ont., and Oxford, Conn., uplink stations, and real estate, manufacturing facilities, and the inventory of set-top decoder boxes and antennas, will be offered for sale by the receiver and AlphaStar Television over the next few weeks, Ernst & Young said.

Back to the top of the page
We welcome your comments.
Copyright © 1997, The Globe and Mail Company ®
All rights reserved.

******************
******************************************************

Tee-Comm is the parent company of AlphaStar US and AlphaStar Canada.

Tee-Comm/AlphaStar Internet Web Page
Click to Return to Hot Satellite News
Click to Return to HC Satellite Home Page


For help and/or information on a particular stock or security, please fill out this questionnaire.

Tee-Comm Electronics, Inc.

On February 3, 1998, a class action lawsuit was filed on February 3, 1998, in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of Tee-Comm Electronics, Inc. ("Tee-Comm" or the "Company") between July 31, 1996 and May 27, 1997, inclusive (the "Class Period"). The complaint charges the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Tee-Comm, among others, during the relevant time period, with violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, by, among other things, issuing to the investing public materially false and misleading statements and press releases concerning Tee-Comm's satellite television division, AlphaStar Television Network, Inc. ("AlphaStar"). Specifically, the complaint alleges that, at all relevant times, defendants issued a series of statements which portrayed Tee-Comm and Alphastar in highly positive terms while failing to disclose that the Company was rapidly running out of cash, was not generating sufficient new subscribers and revenue to continue as a going concern and was nearing insolvency. Because of the issuance of a series of materially false and misleading statements and press releases concerning Tee-Comm's financial condition and the operations of AlphaStar, the price of Tee-Comm common stock was artificially inflated during the Class Period. On May 27, 1997, Tee-Comm issued a press release announcing that the Company's lender had demanded immediate repayment of all existing credit facilities and that its Board of Directors had resigned. That same day, Tee-Comm announced that AlphaStar had filed for bankruptcy. In response to these announcements, on May 27, 1997, the price of Tee-Comm stock closed down at $0.50 per share, a decline of 95% from a Class Period high of $10.1875 reached on September 16, 1996. Thereafter, Tee-Comm's U.S. divisions all filed for bankruptcy. On June 3, 1997, trading in the Company's stock was halted and, subsequently, it was delisted from trading on NASDAQ.



To: trader14U who wrote (1594)5/8/1999 12:56:00 PM
From: who cares?  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10354
 
I hope all of you ZSUN longs and Francoise(e forever added on purpose) sheep are reading the ZSUN rajun bull thread this weekend.
ragingbull.com
You can clearly see the stress is getting to poor Francoise. I see he just called a poster a "homo" because the poster added an "e" to his name repeatedly. Of course Francoise never says anything that direct, instead in that fingernail on chalboard slimy lawyer-speak of his he posts "you are confiming my earlier suspicion that you are a homo." Keep in mind he's saying this to a respected editor of an online financial website whose only crime is to be against Francoise on this stock. Of course Mr. Davis, and i'm sure the reporter at CBS Marketwatch, are now part of the great conspiracy to bring this darling of a stock down. Puhhhleeezee.
You'll also note that Francoise is once again breaking the law by posting inside information. Funny how the company is going to sue everyone in sight but fails to see that they're the ones that are doing the things clearly in violation of SEC regulations. Among the inside information that was passed to Francoise and from him to the public was this gem in regards to the mystery financials;
This time, I got a definite, resounding: " Yes, they are finally ready!". There was some unforseen delays with the Auditors, because the financials will form the basis for the application to NASDAQ and the lawyers, for the same reasons and perhaps also the pending Law suits. Believe me when I say that they are super keen to get them out to the public.
On Monday, the documents will be in the hand of the S&P and will be published by Tuesday or Wednesday, at the very latest. That is all I know! I may get an e-mail from ZSUN management during the weekend as further confirmation, in which case I will post here.


You can see that Francoise quotes from the company that the financials are "finally ready." This clearly shows that the company was lying in it's April 19 press release when they stated the following;

SAN DIEGO, April 19 /PRNewswire/ -- ZiaSun Technologies Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: ZSUN - news; www.ziasun.com) today announced the completion of the consolidated audit of the 1998 financial statements of the company and its subsidiaries.

If they were complete then, then how come they're "finally complete" now? Or maybe ZSUN is completely legit and Francoise is making the whole thing up. Either Francoise or ZSUN is lying through their teeth(again) It's one or the other, or yes, it could be both.
Again folks ask yourself, why would ZSUN lie? If the financials weren't complete, why post that they were? Why not just wait a couple of weeks until they are ready.(and that's yet to be seen) Why split a $20 stock at the same time. Simple, to get the price back up on the stock. Again I ask you, is this how a legitimate business does it? How many times have you seen a CEO of a company interviewed on CNBC, and when asked about stock valuation they always tell you, that's not their focus. They concentrate on growing the business and creating shareholder value, not pumping the stock through artificial or out and out wrongful means.
Francoise if your telling the truth then you are the biggest sucker that's ever invested in the market. How many times does this company have to lie to you before you catch on. Tobin, if Francoise is lying then you are a damn fool for not sueing him. He makes your company look like a POS when time and again he promises something either from you or the company and it doesn't come true. If he's not in contact with you then you should be suing him on all 7 continents for damaging ZSUN's credibility, if he's in contact with someone else at the company or the PR firm, then you should have that person keel hauled for hurting ZSUN far more than he helps.
Buyer and Touts beware.

CMB