SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Lam Research (LRCX, NASDAQ): To the Insiders -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (2843)5/9/1999 7:13:00 PM
From: Clarksterh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5867
 
Brian - Just another well informed fund manager - They have lost market share to both Applied Materials and Novellus over the last several years

Yup. Definitely true. They went from 0% market share in CVD to 0% market share in CVD. Novellus is just eating Lam's revenue base.

Clark

PS It is true that Lam lost money developing an ultimately worthless CVD, but that is hardly a major negative going forward, and to call it 'losing market share' is very misleading.



To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (2843)5/9/1999 10:02:00 PM
From: Duker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5867
 
I was away and read the hard copy version ... I will not waste my time responding to his idiocy ( I haven't read your link, but I assume that it is in reference to the Barron's piece).

At first, I thought that Barron's had transposed the Picks and Pans in the graphic. Clearly, this is the Technology Warren Buffett ... chose a company to go long where you have to justify the target price with a .1% Cap Rate ... and pan a company like LRCX where you don't know what the CY00 estimate is ... and then set a short target price that equates to about 10x's consensus ...

It was good to hear that NVLS took market share from LRCX last year???

--Duker