Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Hackett who wrote (56112)	5/9/1999 10:42:00 AM
From: H James Morris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Paul, does over valued = over-fed? Does under valued = under-fed? Now, the real investing skill is buying now the under-fed, and in a correcting Sector, shorting the over-fed. I think 221 to 136 shows a sign of over-fed so its just correcting, but for the veteran bulls here, I don't think they should worry. You'll notice every time a good veteran gambler leaves the table he never leaves @ the peak, some even give up 50% of their gains, before calling it a day. Now, the one's I like to watch are the gamblers that jump in and out. They call that "In out, In out and shake it all about", we have none of those here. What do you think??

To: Paul Hackett who wrote (56112)	5/9/1999 1:25:00 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

AGREED - CDNW a much better value than AMAZON now and is also a takeover target. While AMAZON was flying CDNW was going down or stagnating. Now the directions will reverse.