Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bullmarket who wrote (43301)	5/9/1999 1:00:00 PM
From: E'Lane	Respond to of 50264

The difference this time is that it appears the deals are getting done (as was pointed out by the host of the show, not by Jimmy Chin!). One more comment I wanted to make, and I'll post it to you since the person who brought it up has reached "persona non grata" status with me... It was mentioned that the hosts of this show probably made such comments because they owned the stock. Well, the PR clearly states that this show was paid for only in cash. They do NOT take stock in payment. So, in my mind, if these hosts DO own DGIV stock, then they were firmly convinced it was a wise investment by their talk with Mr. Chin. 100's of OTC:BB's cross their desk every week. Yes, I'd say that if they see a stock worth investing in at the early stages, then they would be fools to NOT invest and own shares. It would cause a loss of credibility though if they interjected their own opinions into an interview only for these reasons, and that would cost them viewers. Again, JMO. Anyway, could be right, could be wrong...but I just don't see any downside to this interview. UNLESS, it is NOT followed by a host of PR's. I think this company has wised up far too much in the last year to do that. Anyway...headed to a play in Nashville..."Footloose". See you all this evening! Have a great day! E!

To: bullmarket who wrote (43301)	5/9/1999 1:42:00 PM
From: Kurt_Ruckus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Happy Mother's day to all you moms out there!!!

To: bullmarket who wrote (43301)	5/9/1999 2:48:00 PM
From: eric larson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Since DGIV's marketing strategy is as an adjunct to existing overseas telephone companies -- rather than as a direct competitor to them -- DGIV seems not to control its own fate as a competitor that can drive the telephone companies to switch over to IP telephony and make use of DGIV technology. I wouldn't think DGIV's telephone company partners will switch over unless and until price-competition motivates them to do so. (How long the wait for revenues? Conspicuously absent from the show was mention of becoming a reporting company. Is the show possibly the first-shot in a PR campaign to raise the stock price to minimum valuation status...possibly in anticipation of no significant revenues to report before filing deadlines arrive?) Are DGIV's "signed contracts" exclusive? Perhaps we should be rooting for other IP telephony companies to infiltrate the regions of the companies with whom DGIV allegedly has "signed contracts"...to accelerate those firms' switchover to IP telephony, so DGIV can begin seeing some revenues? At least it seems DGIV won't have to deal with bill collections in the UAE. :)