Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Father Terrence who wrote (37366)	5/9/1999 2:21:00 PM
From: Edwarda	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Very nice, dear, but it's only the first pass.

To: Father Terrence who wrote (37366)	5/9/1999 2:35:00 PM
From: Chuzzlewit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

That's normative as all get out. Suppose we have a society whose members are by and large Catholics, and well-versed in Aristotle and Aquinas. So they pass a bunch of laws based on objective (depends on whose ox is being gored, no?) criteria. What then? Let's take one example by way of illustration. Let us construct a Catholic libertarian who accepts your construct but also throws into his philosophical word view the concept of an immortal soul that exists at the time of conception. Such a society would be expected to pass laws against abortion based on the consistent argument that a zygote is a person with an immortal soul, and protection of the individual is supreme. So the right of the woman is subordinated to the right of the zygote based on normative philosophical premises. [I am not a Catholic, but I am more than superficially familiar with Catholicism and am struck by the rock-solid logic upon which much of the theology is based. My problems are with its premises (but that's another argument).] TTFN, CTC