SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (80666)5/10/1999 6:10:00 AM
From: kapkan4u  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
<Don't forget about IA-64 in the long term. Intel has big plans for IA-64 to take over the high-end market and dwarf the RISC competition for good. This effort will start with Merced, get a big boost from McKinley, then continue with Madison and Deerfield. Not only that, but starting with Deerfield, Intel also plans to push IA-64 down to the desktop level.>

I hope you right about the success of IA-64. The first acid test for Merced will be its performance comparisons to Foster and Alpha. The second acid test will be compilers and applications support.

<By the way, it's interesting that you mention the Internet as the main driving force behind increased server sales. Keep in mind that there are many, many different types of servers out there. Some only need to host a privately-owned web site which receives only a moderate amount of hits. Some have to handle millions of transactions a day. Some are even powerful enough to become replacements for corporate mainframes. In any case, I don't know any other company that has the volume and the leverage to cover the entire spectrum of servers than Intel.>

One more name comes to mind: SUNW. I would really like to know the market share numbers between x86 and sparc servers.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (80666)5/10/1999 10:42:00 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Ten,

I wouldn't necessarily call the P6 core "aging," because if you really take a good look at the K7 design, it's not much more than a "P6-plus."

From a CPU architect's point of view, the K7 core is radically different than K6 and P6- both in philosophy and implementation. The floating point units have been completely redesigned. I can see little in common with the P6 core other than the sharing of the Pentium instruction set.

Scumbria