Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BobS who wrote (19077)	5/10/1999 11:12:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Respond to of 20681

Well, not completely miniumized them ( to the max): To Mark S., your question is extremely relevant. Who opened the damn COC containers before the testing began at Ledoux? To Rick, Tom, and others berating Tim H., why do you scold the messenger? Your ill will is better aimed at the former directors of Naxos and likely some Ledoux employees. As activist shareholders I would think you'd expend your energy ensuring these former directors have NO influence over the present-day Naxos ..>> Remember, we are in this to make money. This Mark key into on the Pre Crack is very important for discussion. LeDoux is responsible to account for the whys and wheretofores on this also. COC has a meaning. Chuca Chucka Charles Now where the PGMs? Pilot Plant NOW is what we wait for.

To: BobS who wrote (19077)	5/10/1999 11:12:00 PM
From: Carlo	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20681

With regards to the news article, You got to wonder if Ledoux intentionally planned to open those containers the day before just so they could allow an easy alibi for use later. How convenient it would be to use the "contamination" theme to enable Ledoux to justify walking away from the truth (as history eventually taught us). Maybe for business reasons Ledoux just wanted out; therefore they figured out a way to wash their hands of Naxos. By Screwing up the COC, they could deny validation.

To: BobS who wrote (19077)	5/11/1999 9:40:00 AM
From: Tom Frederick	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Bob S. You make Tim Hall sound like Joan of Arc. Give me a break. Tim posts a clearly biased article about past events and selectively posts only the worst parts of the article most damaging to Naxos. This takes courage? Why is reminding us of the damage that Jimmy and crew did to the company help us now and why is it important to remind us of where Naxos came from...AGAIN? Tim has an agenda. He is not commenting on current events, not enlightening us about Mr. Gardner, Bromine leach, Martin Blake or the most recent test results. He IS refreshing peoples minds about just how bad things have been. That's "have been" as in, the past. There is no scenario that can erase all of the past events and I personally wish we could erase the last 8 years of the serpentine course Naxos has taken. But Bob is doing the only thing he can do at this point. Take up the reigns with honesty and integrity with a genuine interest in finally proving to shareholders, in the most definitive way possible (recovered metal) just whether or not FL has anything worth extracting. I trust that Bob and his team will tell us TRUTHFULLY if the pilot plant works or not. But not one day before he and the team feel that they have tried their best. Bob has made it clear. This is it. He has put his chip on the table with Martin and the rest of team with this specific method of recovery. He doesn't have another ace up the sleeve. Bob has not hyped any results, and if fact, has downplayed the released results to date reminding us that recovery in volume is the only thing that counts. So in this environment, why does it take "courage" to post an article which fans the flames of doubt by rehashing what we already know about the past? Bob, your loyalty to a friend is admirable, but in this case it is not well placed. Tim is not being helpful to finding the final answer about FL. Tom F.