Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PiMac who wrote (12369)	5/12/1999 7:20:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Bubba should have told the truth just as you and I would be required to do when we made our objections and exhausted all our appeals. Better yet, he should have kicked his dumbass lawyer for not settling in the first place. Even better still, he should have told the First Shrew to shove it (she was dead set against a settlement) and settled despite the fact it would have made obvious what kind of people these Arkansas hillbillies really are. JLA

To: PiMac who wrote (12369)	5/12/1999 7:50:00 AM
From: Liatris Spicata	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

PiMac- Talk About Insults- <<and a tactical focus as slimy as any Libertarian.>> That's a pretty sleazy, unsubstantiated little insult coming from such a self-righteous sort. Perhaps you'd like to justify yourself. Allow me to remind you that Harry Browne, the Liberatarian candidate for President in 1996, was the first and only presidential candidate in history to have qualified for federal money and to have refused the stolen bootle. Brwone- and Libertarians in general- refused federal funds because they believe it is wrong to fund political campaigns that way. Where do you get off calling their tactics "slimy"? I submit the Republicrats, with their bellying up to the bar of federal funds to run their campaigns, are much "slimier" than Liberatarians are or are likely to be. I'd certainly suggest that Mr. Browne has more integrity than you have displayed with unsubstantiated insults like that. Larry

To: PiMac who wrote (12369)	5/13/1999 2:18:00 AM
From: Bob Lao-Tse	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

"I doubt I ever said such, so enlighten me..." Enlightenment: "The a fortiori certainty is that the man was committing no Crime in his unusual testimony, but was Supporting something else, something not illegal, something Constitutional." "He was obligated to prevent the court from acting illegally and causing innocent damage, even though his be an illegal action. "He should be praised." "If the court would cause damage, even to Clinton alone, with an illegal order, then Clinton is obligated to Not observe his obligation to the court." "But the perjury was also an objection to the law that the judge was depending upon to rule upon the facts." Certainly sounds to me as if you're saying that Clinton lied as a considered objection to a court that he felt had overstepped its bounds. "Rather than go into your self-serving errors of fact..." Oh please do! -BLT