Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CYRIX / NSM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Craig Freeman who wrote (32239)	5/12/1999 8:52:00 PM
From: Saltheart	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33344

Pravin, I guess all the NSM detractors are in denial. Did they miss the PR today from SMTC? Amazing to me that they continue to claim that the Fab is a liability to NSM and not an asset. I too believe NSM has turned the corner and good things are happening. Hell, I'm up over 100%++ so maybe I'm a little biased... =:o)

To: Craig Freeman who wrote (32239)	5/12/1999 9:16:00 PM
From: FJB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33344

TSMC said the reason they didn't want Portland was that it was using an incompatible process. That sounds totally incorrect. Where did you read/hear this? Bob

To: Craig Freeman who wrote (32239)	5/12/1999 9:23:00 PM
From: Pravin Kamdar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33344

Craig, Where did you hear that the Portland fab and TSMC use incompatible processes? I believe that is in error. Pravin.