SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : George Gilder - Forbes ASAP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Clarksterh who wrote (1534)5/13/1999 10:19:00 PM
From: D. Newberry  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5853
 
Hi Clark,

<<Cable capacity vs DSL:
Just out of curiosity I worked through some numbers......>>

I understand your point completely, although I don't believe the cable providers are allocating anywhere near that much bandwidth to internet access traffic.

<<Thus, DSL wins. But it should be noted that for a fairly small price cable can decrease the number of households per headend. Add an extra 2 or 3 headends and cable wins in both cases>>

Of course, the same can be true of DSL. By bringing fiber closer to the curb, the copper loop is shorter and bandwidth increases. In both cases, additional investment is required.

Don't get me wrong. I am not advocating DSL over Cable. I suspect that both technologies will find their place. Marketing will probably have more to do with success than technology anyway (remember betamax vs. VHS?).

Thanks for your thoughts.

Regards,



To: Clarksterh who wrote (1534)5/14/1999 12:35:00 AM
From: JGoren  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5853
 
I understand that when the RBOC's bring in the fiber, they stop at the unit, and there is still copper inside. What happens to DSL if fiber were brought all the way into the house.