Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rande Is who wrote (6722)	5/13/1999 2:05:00 PM
From: Peter C.	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 57584

Rande, I appreciate your thoughtful response. (PLCOP) The scenario that you outline does seem to make sense. The size of the transaction seemed completely out of context and the initial thought I had was that a balancing between MM's could have been the cause. But I also would not expect it to hit the time and sales without special codes used for that purpose. Since the stock had closed at well above the sell price it seems that your logical explanation merits attention from the viewpoint of an all-or-none transaction. I guess we will never know what caused this since the stock PLCOP seems to have recovered nicely. Back to lurking.. P.C>