Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : General Magic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rob Anderson who wrote (6175)	5/13/1999 8:03:00 PM
From: Gandro	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10081

Audio Advertisements I am a bit concerned about the revenue strategy for VUI. I am referring to audio advertisements. When browsing the web, a banner advertisement may be a nusiance, but does little to slow me down. If I have to listen to a bombardment of audio ads before Portico lets me get on with my business, that could start getting on my nerves. I would rather see flat rate pricing, per minute charge or General Magic receiving a portion of any VUI purchase transaction. Please share your comments on this subject.

To: Rob Anderson who wrote (6175)	5/14/1999 11:15:00 AM
From: RidgeRunner	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10081

Hi, Rob. What follows has nothing to do with the merits of General Magic as a company. (I don't know enough to have an opinion!) It is strictly a technical analysis observation based on the GMGC daily price chart. My comments regarding "filling price gaps" referred to the tendency of most stocks to come back and fill a gap on a price chart before resuming the nominal trend. For example, I noticed that the GMGC chart shows two recent price gaps, a big one at about the 3&5/8 level and a smaller previous one down around 3&3/8. These normally result from a move that catches the MMs by surprise. They may get a bunch of buy orders and few sellers, so they must sell short or sell from their own cache of shares to support the market as it moves higher. At some point they are stuck on the wrong side of the market with large paper losses. What they will try to do is then drop the price using small lot trades (hundreds vs thousands of shares) to incrementally work the price down to where they can buy enough shares cheaply to cover their previous sales. If this is done quickly it is a "shakeout" because it scares the small investors who then sell their stock in fear that prices will go even lower, thereby adding fuel to the fire forcing prices lower still. Eventually the MMs can purchase enough stock at a low enough price to cover their previous paper losses and maybe even make some money or establish a new cache of shares before they allow the market to move back up. This manipulation is the price we pay for liquidity in the marketplace. It can also be predictable. That's why I asked if anyone on this thread was concerned about the vulnerability of the stock to this gap-filling potential. If you are a long term holder of the stock it may not matter. If you are a short term trader it can be pretty important. For some of us it may also be a buying opportunity. Best wishes, RidgeRunner