SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (12497)5/16/1999 11:25:00 AM
From: Catfish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
Read the article again:

Scientist tranfers secret data from government computer
The New York Times
Date: 04/28/99 11:15

WASHINGTON -- A scientist suspected of spying for China improperly transferred huge amounts of secret data from a computer system at a government laboratory, compromising virtually every nuclear weapon in the United States arsenal, government and lab officials say.

The data -- millions of lines of computer code that approximate how this country's atomic warheads work -- were downloaded from a computer system at the Los Alamos, N.M., weapons lab that is open only to those with top-level security clearances, according to the officials.

The scientist, Wen Ho Lee, then transferred the files to a widely accessible computer network at the lab, where they were stored under other file names, the officials said.

The Taiwan-born scientist transferred most of the secret data in 1994 and 1995, officials said.

American experts said the data would be useful to any nuclear power trying to replicate this country's atomic designs. But one American scientist said the codes and accompanying data were not, by themselves, sufficient to produce an exact copy of an American weapon.

American officials said there was evidence that the files were accessed by someone after they were placed in the unclassified network. Other evidence suggests that this was done by a person who improperly used a password, the officials said.

The investigation is continuing, and officials do not know whether the data transferred by Lee was obtained by another country.

In 1996, Lee became the focus of an FBI investigation into a separate case, what American official believe was China's theft from Los Alamos of design data for America's most advanced warhead, the W-88. That theft apparently took place in the 1980s. China has denied stealing the material.

Now officials fear that a much broader array of nuclear test data may have been moved to Beijing in the 1990s. Lee has not been charged with any crime.

Federal investigators did not discover the evidence of huge file transfers until last month, when they examined Lee's office computer in connection with their investigation of the earlier theft at Los Alamos, a sprawling lab complex about 35 miles outside Santa Fe.

They then found evidence that Lee, who held one of the government's highest security clearances, had been transferring enormous files involving millions of lines of secret computer code, officials said.

Although Lee had been under investigation in the W-88 case for nearly three years, Los Alamos officials failed to monitor his computer use and let him retain his access to nuclear secrets until late 1998.

Lee was fired by the Energy Department for security violations on March 8. His attorney, Mark Holscher of Los Angeles, did not return a telephone call. In the past, Holscher has denied any wrongdoing by his client.

President Clinton was first told of the new evidence by Energy Secretary Bill Richardson on March 31. During a subsequent meeting at the White House residence in early April, the president told Richardson to "get to the bottom of it," Richardson recalled in an interview Tuesday.

Earlier in March, before being briefed by Richardson, the president said he had not been told of any evidence of espionage during his administration.

In response to the new evidence and with the president's support, Richardson shut down the classified computer systems at Los Alamos and two other major nuclear weapons laboratories this month. He ordered changes in the computer security procedures to make it more difficult to move nuclear secrets out of the classified networks.

"These Wen Ho Lee transgressions cannot occur any more," Richardson said in the interview.

Congressional leaders were told of the new evidence in classified briefings last week.

The huge scale of the security breach has shocked some officials, and has prompted a new sense of urgency in the FBI to solve the Los Alamos spy case. The bureau is now pouring additional agents and resources into the investigation. The evidence of transfers from his office computer provided the basis for an FBI search of Lee's home on April 10, officials said. Lee is believed to be still living in Los Alamos.

Republican Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, chairman of the Select Committee on Intelligence, said in an interview that the briefings on the new evidence "confirmed my worst fears that China's espionage is ongoing, it's deep and we can't wish it away."

All content © 1999 The Kansas City Star

Posted for discussion and educational purposes only. Not for commercial use.



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (12497)5/16/1999 11:40:00 AM
From: Catfish  Respond to of 13994
 
China Military Upgrade Promoted

nytimes.com
Filed at 9:49 a.m. EDT

By The Associated Press
BEIJING (AP) -- NATO's bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade shows that China should hasten the modernization of its armed forces, official media said Sunday.

China needs to hurry up and modernize its weaponry and tactics in order to ''assiduously safeguard national sovereignty and dignity,'' the Communist Party's flagship People's Daily said on the front page.

Particularly important is China's need to defend itself against high-tech weapons, the paper said, indicating that China's generals have taken note of the devastation wrought by satellite-guided missiles and other leading-edge military hardware employed by NATO in its drive to bomb Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic into withdrawing his forces from Kosovo.


It quoted an unidentified officer from the second artillery, China's missile corps, as saying that forces need to train harder to get more out of the advanced weaponry they have now.

While not mentioning Kosovo, the article and similar ones in the military's Jiefang Daily follow official calls since the attack for all Chinese to redouble efforts to catch up with the West.

The embassy bombing outraged Chinese, many of whom reject NATO's claim that the bombing was an accident, instead viewing it as the vanguard of a U.S. campaign to humiliate and weaken China. Enraged crowds stoned NATO countries' missions in a score of Chinese cities, trapping the American ambassador in his embassy in Beijing for four days and burning the home of the U.S. consul in the western city of Chengdu.

China has opposed the bombing campaign from the start, arguing that it is unlawful intervention in Yugoslavia's domestic affairs.

Many feel the NATO bombing augurs ill for China's ability to deal as it sees fit with strife in Tibet and Xinjiang -- territories where it is accused of repressing non-Chinese native populations -- or reunify with Taiwan, the island it considers a breakaway province to be reunified with by force if necessary.

Since the 1991 Gulf War, China has focused on developing pockets of modern military strength amid what is generally considered a hopelessly backwards force of 2.9 million men. Last year, President Jiang Zemin ordered the military to give up its business interests in an effort to make it more professional and crack down on smuggling and corruption.

nytimes.com

Posted for educational and discussion purposes only. Not vor commercial use.



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (12497)5/16/1999 11:50:00 AM
From: Catfish  Respond to of 13994
 
SNATCHING AMERICA'S WEAPONS SECRETS
Documents Provide New Details About How the Chinese Did It

May 12, 1999

By Jim Krane

NEW YORK (APBNews.com) -- A major chapter in the Chinese espionage scandal that has enveloped the White House, Congress and the Pentagon began in a quiet meeting of two scientists in a Beijing hotel room in January 1985.

One of the scientists, physicist Peter Lee, was a Chinese-American researcher on U.S. defense projects at the Department of Energy's Lawrence Livermore lab in California.

The other, a scientist with China's nuclear weapons agency, Chen Nengkuan, wanted Lee to share his secret knowledge of lasers and nuclear weapons simulations. Chen pleaded with Lee to help China, saying Lee's native land was a "poor country."

So Lee obliged. According to federal court documents related to Lee's 1997 prosecution on espionage-related charges, Chen told Lee that he could answer questions about classified U.S. technology without speaking, just by nodding his head.

Related Documents:
Government statements from the Peter Lee prosecution:
GIF PDF (3.32 MB)

Peter Lee's sentencing memorandum:
GIF PDF (7.16 MB)

Turning over laser technology secrets

By the meeting's end, Lee had given Chen American laser technology secrets, according to an FBI agent's description of a confession Lee gave after failing a polygraph test in 1997.

The next day, Jan. 10, 1985, a Chinese scientist picked Lee up at his hotel in Beijing and drove him to a meeting with a group of Chinese scientists who worked for the Chinese Academy of Engineering Physics, the agency responsible for the country's nuclear weapons program.

For the next two hours, Lee answered questions and discussed problems with U.S. nuclear weapons testing simulations. He drew scientific diagrams, issued specific numbers regarding U.S. weapons technology and revealed experimental results, the court documents state. Lee also divulged the classified findings of one of his own research papers, written at Livermore.

Among the scientists listening to Lee's surreptitious presentation was Yu Min, described in the court documents as "China's Edward Teller." Teller was a leader among scientists who developed U.S. nuclear weapons.

More giveaways

The 1985 meetings in Beijing weren't Lee's only technology lessons for Chinese scientists. According to court documents and evidence records, Lee met with Chinese scientists in the United States and China and communicated with them by telephone, e-mail and fax.

In 1997, while Lee was working on a classified Pentagon contract with TRW Inc., the Chinese Academy of Engineering Physics paid Lee's expenses for a three-week visit to China, where Lee handed out vital radar technology used to track underwater submarines, the documents reveal.

Lee made these visits possible, records show, by falsifying his travel reports for TRW -- required by employees with access to secret technology -- and denying he met or cooperated with Chinese intelligence gatherers.

Slight punishment

But efforts by the FBI to prosecute Lee for his confessed transgressions bore little fruit. According to The New York Times, the U.S. Justice Department and Department of the Navy declined to give prosecutors permission to discuss details of the secret radar technology. Thus, Lee was able to plead guilty to reduced charges in a plea-bargain.

In December 1997, Lee began serving 12 months in a halfway house and three years' probation. He was also ordered to pay a $20,000 fine.

A textbook case of espionage

According to Chinese Intelligence Operations, written by U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency analyst Nicholas Eftimiades, Chinese intelligence agencies employ a "time-honored practice" of using Chinese scientists to invite U.S. counterparts to China on "academic exchanges."

Lee's lecture to Chinese scientists appears quite similar to the scenario described in Eftimiades' 1994 book:

"Generally, COSTIND [China's Commission of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense] covers all expenses for visiting scientists and their families. After the scheduled classroom lectures, 'special sessions' are held for the commission's experts."

In addition, Eftimiades wrote, COSTIND sends Chinese scientists to the United States to collect information and identify needed technology or weapons systems.

Highlights from the court documents

The Government's Response to Defendant's Position

The FBI gave Peter Lee two polygraph examinations. After Lee failed the first exam, on Oct. 7, 1997, "defendant confessed to passing classified information to the PRC in 1985." Peter Lee also failed his second polygraph examination, given on Feb. 26, 1998. (pp.4-5)

Gilbert R. Cordova, special agent with the FBI's Los Angeles Division, states: "Two scientific institutions within the PRC [People's Republic of China] in particular are involved in targeting American scientists, inviting them to the PRC, ostensibly for discussions and lectures relating to non-classified subjects, and then attempting to obtain discrete pieces of classified scientific and technical information from visiting American scientists ... the China Academy of Engineering Physics (CAEP), which is responsible for all aspects of the PRC's nuclear weapons program, and the Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics (IAPCM) ... which designs the PRC nuclear weapons arsenal." (p.2)

Cordova states that Lee has been involved in a radar ocean-imaging project with anti-submarine warfare application and has researched nuclear weapons detonation simulations, including experiments involving the use of laser energy in these simulations.

Cordova says that after reviewing Lee's statements to the FBI, his employment records and various forms of surveillance, he has concluded that Lee "has had numerous contacts with representatives of the PRC, which he has failed to report to his employers. These contacts have included countless letters, facsimile communications, e-mail exchanges, telephone calls and personal visits with representatives of the PRC, including PRC nuclear weapons scientists." (p.6)

During his visits to China, one of the scientists Lee came in contact with was Wang Ganchang, whom Cordova says is "considered the 'father' of the PRC nuclear weapons program." (p.6)

Cordova says that in his 1997 China visit, Lee "traveled as a guest of the IAPCM and CAEP, which paid for his expenses while he was in the PRC." When contacted by Cordova later that year, Lee "said that he had paid all his own expenses during his trip to the PRC, and that his trip to the PRC had only been for sightseeing and pleasure."

Cordova refers to e-mail and fax communication between Lee and Guo Hong, in which Lee asks Guo "to provide him with receipts indicating that Peter Hoong-Yee Lee paid for his trip to the PRC, and Peter Hoong-Yee Lee asked that these receipts contain his and his wife's names in English and show that he paid cash." Cordova says that based on his "review of e-mail transmissions and telephone conversations" between Lee and Guo Hong, Lee "did not pay for his hotel or airline travel within the PRC, and the receipts provided are false."

Cordova says that Lee "has had countless contacts with nationals of the PRC, which he has not reported to TRW Inc., despite his obligation to do so in order to maintain his security clearance." Lee "has had countless contacts with PRC scientists in the PRC and in the United States," and noted that "these scientists include several known to be conducting nuclear and laser experiments with military applications at various institutions in the PRC." (p.9)

Cordova notes numerous communications between Lee and Guo Hong, a scientist at the South China Normal University's Institute of Quantum Electronics. Guo Hong was making arrangements for Lee "to meet with various representatives of the IAPCM and CAEP, to include He Xiantu, Du Xiangwan, Wang Ganchang, Chen Nengkuan and Yu Min. These are all high-level, well-known PRC nuclear weapons scientists." (pp.9-10)

In Cordova's statement about Lee's 1997 confession, he describes a videotaped interview that was conducted "immediately following the administration of the polygraph examination." Lee stated that on or about Jan. 10, 1985, "he was picked up at his Beijing hotel by a PRC scientist and driven to another hotel, where a group of PRC scientists were waiting for him in a small conference room." Lee said that "for approximately two hours he answered questions from the group and drew several diagrams for them, including several hohlraum diagrams, specific numbers which describe the hohlraum design and experimental results, and he discussed problems the United States was having in its nuclear weapons testing simulation program."

Cordova says that Lee "identified the scientists in attendance on Jan. 10, 1985, as Chen Nengkuan, Yu Min, Wang Shiji, Tao Zucong, all of CAEP," and three to five others whose names Lee could not remember. Cordova notes that Dale Nielsen Sr., associate director of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, told the FBI that Yu Min, one of the scientists with whom Lee met, "is considered the 'Edward Teller' of the PRC nuclear weapons program. (Edward Teller is considered the most important contributor to the U.S. thermonuclear bomb effort.) Nielsen said the fact that Yu was part of the discussion indicates the high priority the PRC scientists placed on [Lee's] information and the technical level of the questions the PRC scientists asked." (pp.14-16)

Cordova states that during Lee's 1997 China visit, "he gave a lecture at the [IAPCM] ... and provided to PRC scientists information concerning his work in support of a radar ocean-imaging project." Cordova says that Lee "identified the attendees at this lecture as He Xiantu, Du Xiangwan, Chen Nengkuan, Yu Min, all nuclear weapons scientists with IAPCM or CAEP," and some 25 others whose names Lee could not recall. Lee "said he told his audience that his lecture was on microwave scattering from ocean waves. Someone from the audience questioned [Lee] about its applications to anti-submarine warfare, [and Lee] said he agreed with the questioner that that was its application. ... He said he told the Chinese where to filter data within the graph to enhance the ability to locate the ocean wake of a vessel." (pp.16-17)
Highlights from the defendant's sentencing memorandum

Lee describes his work for the national laboratories and TRW: "in plasma physics, fluid mechanics and microwave scattering from water waves" for TRW from 1973-76; "in laser fusion experiments and diagnostic development" at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory from 1976-84; "on experiments in pulsed power physics and strong-field physics using sub-ps lasers" at the Los Alamos National Laboratory from 1984-91; and on "microwave ocean-scattering physics" at TRW from 1991 through December 1997. (p.4)

While the government cites the many scientists with whom Lee met, Lee himself describes his last visit as his "1997 travels, while on vacation, in the People's Republic of China." Lee says that he inaccurately filled out a required document describing his visit to China because he was "merely attempting to avoid the often burdensome paperwork and debriefings which accompany the disclosures of foreign contacts when [he] felt that the contacts were both harmless, unrelated to classified matters and often took place during his personal and/or vacation time." (p.5)

Lee says that his 1985 visit to China, in which he shared classified information relating to laser plasma physics, "occurred in a spirit of scientific camaraderie and was not a political act." Lee says that two fellow scientists who have offered statements of support "have both offered views of [me] completely consistent with [my] simple nonpolitical desire to work with and assist other scientists." (p.7)

Although Lee admits that in 1985 he did share information which was deemed classified, he says that "the classified hohlraum research which was disclosed, in fact, at the time it was disclosed, was far from a secret in the international scientific community." Lee quotes supporters as saying that there was "no realistic connection between nuclear weapons" and the research in which Lee was engaged, and finally that "the project's real vitality was its potential to provide energy self-sufficiency to populations in need throughout the world." Finally, Lee notes that this hohlraum information was finally declassified "in approximately 1993 in part because of the views of many who worked closely in the field that there was no need to classify it." (pp.7-8)

In response to FBI Agent Cordova's claim to contact between Lee and Wang Ganchang, Lee's response is the following: "What Agent Cordova has chosen to omit ... is the fact that Wang Ganchang, at the time he first met the defendant in 1980, was some 74 years old, had been out of nuclear weapons research for approximately 10 years and was working in the area of pulse power and excimer lasers (totally unrelated to weaponry) at the time of his acquaintance with the defendant." (p.12)

With respect to information Lee allegedly shared during his 1997 visit to China, "none of this information was classified [and this] has been confirmed ... by Dr. Bruce Lake at TRW, who supervised the project about which Dr. Lee gave his talk." The document continues to state that "following the defendant's post-plea debriefing by Dr. Richard Twogood of the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, who formerly headed the radar imaging program, Dr. Twogood informed those present that the information about which Dr. Lee spoke during his 1997 lecture was 'clearly all unclassified' and 'meaningless.'" (p.15)

Erik Storm, Lee's former supervisor at the Lawrence Livermore, suggests that the information Lee revealed during his 1985 visit to China "was already available in the open literature and was declassified five years later." In addition, Storm says, "release of this information would have had NO impact on U.S. national security." He also says that "possession of a Q Clearance (as Dr. Lee had while at LLNL and Los Alamos) does not give automatic access to [classified information relating to] nuclear weapons design and operation and nuclear weapons stockpile information. Access to such data is on a strict need-to-know basis, and Dr. Lee did not have such a need at LLNL or at Los Alamos, and access to such data would have been recorded. Thus, unless LLNL and Los Alamos records show such access, Dr. Lee could not have imparted nuclear weapons sensitive data."

Storm states that Lee's work had to do with the generation of energy and did not have anything to do with technology involved in nuclear weapons.

Storm concludes that "Dr. Lee clearly violated the United States and DOE classification rules if in fact he disclosed [information relating to his work] in 1985. However, if that is all he did, the potential damage and impact to U.S. national security from the nuclear weapons point of view is not just negligible, but zero."

Court documents state Lee was born in 1939 in Chongqing, China. In 1948, Lee's parents, ardent anti-communists, fled to Hong Kong and then Taiwan. Lee was raised in Taiwan, attended college there until moving to Germany to study in 1963. In 1967, Lee migrated to the United States to join his parents, who had just relocated from Taiwan. In 1968, he began studying aeronautics at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. He graduated with a Ph.D. in 1973.

Jim Krane is an APBNews.com editor (jimk@apbnews.com). APBNews.com researcher Tom Martin contributed to this story.

apbonline.com

Posted for discussion and educational purposes only. Not for commercial use.