SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (58348)5/17/1999 12:21:00 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574595
 
Ten,

I assumed that the 21164 uses a small L1 cache that requires only a single cycle to access.

I believe that the 21164 also uses a multi-cycle L1 cache.

PII/III also uses a small L1 cache, compared to K6, MII or K7. That is probably why PIII is a couple of speed grades ahead of K6, and about 12 speed grades ahead of MII.

Scumbria



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (58348)5/17/1999 12:23:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574595
 
Ten and Thread - Register reports product and chipset delays with k7

theregister.co.uk

Posted 16/05/99 12:32pm by Mike Magee

Taiwanese wire reports K7 chipset news

A report on Taiwanese newswire Digitimes Friday last claimed that third party chipset report for the K7 is unlikely to be available until year end.

According to the report, which we have been unable to confirm with AMD, the first batch of K7s will arrive next month worldwide, but product will not be widely available until Q4.

Motherboard manufacturers in Taiwan are creating K7 mobos with 200MHz FSB, which will arrive in Q3 and use six layer design, with Irongate chipset report.

ViA and SiS, however, are unlikely to be able to support the K7 until the end of the year, according to DigiTimes. Prices for the K7 will be around $400, according to the unconfirmed report.

Staffers from The Register will once more attend the Computex trade fair in Taipei, in early June, and we're likely to get some hard facts then. ®




To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (58348)5/17/1999 12:24:00 AM
From: Scumbria  Respond to of 1574595
 
Ten,

As for a high school kid trying to extrapolate Intel's own speed limits, I totally agree with you. That's why I said Anand was trying to predict the future again. It might make for nice material to fill the pages of a college freshman's research project, but that's about all it is worth.

It appears that he made a boo-boo with this 700MHz thing. It takes maturity and experience to keep youthful enthusiasm from getting out of control.

Scumbria