SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CYRIX / NSM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scott Carr who wrote (32348)5/17/1999 2:00:00 AM
From: AB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33344
 
Yes, Scott "analog VLSI" is a whole different animal, but, besides the reference to Gilder and a 10 year old book by Mead, can you point to any other credible references, i.e. ISSCC, JSSC, Electronic Letters, even EE Times would be a start, etc. which show any sort of research or discussion of this topic.

Why is it that this whole business about Gilder, Foveon, and analog VLSI seems like a scam to sell newsletters?

Anthony



To: Scott Carr who wrote (32348)5/17/1999 11:20:00 AM
From: kash johal  Respond to of 33344
 
Scott,

Re: "Kash, you know not of what you speak. JUST WATCH. Analog VLSI is a whole different animal than DSP's."

Scott, you may be right and you may may be wrong.

Now you could back up your statements regarding analog VLSI by telling us the type of chips that are required. What kind of applications and volumes these are going into. And what compelling advantage National has in this area such as patents,process, design knowhow etc.

Regards,

Kash


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News