SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (57125)5/17/1999 4:32:00 PM
From: Bill Harmond  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
Glenn, If sales are increasing 300%, it's ok to have inventories grow 300%. So far Amazon has managed their business with inventories at 3% of run-rate. Any other retailers you know do that??

Why is it I keep winning our debates?? [bait here] Could it be that Amazon really does have a good model?? [hook here] :)



To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (57125)5/17/1999 4:38:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
Dell has a finte number of components of just in time but AMZN has millions.

Yes but one good thing that amzn has is a finite number of suppliers. Dell has many many more, mostly fly-by-night asian computer parts distributors. I'm not sure which is worse, more suppliers or more individual piece parts.

Edi - btw I'm looking in depth at the B&N site today to answer your questions and contrary to what I thought, it now looks like a reverse-engineered amazon site. That was not true the last time I looked. So, you may be correct there is no difference really between the 2 sites information-wise other than 1) pure # of author comments on the site, 2) amazon "eyes" where they track an author/genre, etc.

However from an investor standpoint I'm not sure I feel good about an online venture that simply reverse engineers somebody else's site. It makes me think they don't have anything creative to add to the party.