To: J T who wrote (3392 ) 5/17/1999 6:19:00 PM From: jmhollen Respond to of 5541
Hi JT, >>OFF TOPIC RESPONSE<< I am thoroughly familiar with all the facts and important personnel involved in the LGOV operation, which is basically building a huge American-style fuels company to serve a major emerging market in central-eastern China. I understand all of the technology involved, from my own personal engineering experiences. The result of LGOV's business operations will favorably affect our balance of trade situation. Do I hold and recommend it; yes. For environmental reasons, China is closing thousands of its contaminated coal mines and has outlawed tree-cutting and the use of charcoal in many heavily populated provinces. Come next winter, those folks are going to require considerable additional quantities of LPG and LNG fuel-gas; TO STAY ALIVE! >>ASSIDE<< Having worked on the "MX/Peacekeeper" project, twice, I am confident that "..our guys.." are smarter that "..their guys..". Although a loss of some of the warhead data (..not yet completely determined..) is damned unfortunate, they would still need a viable delivery system (which they don't have) to get something here. I am further convinced that we have operational equipment ON DUTY, of which the public knows little-to-nothing. This equipment would preclude some "nut" from lobbing anything significant from there to here - and having it go "..BANG.."! >>ON TOPIC<< Your assumption is quite correct. I consider MVEE a "..worthwhile limited risk.."; while I consider other issues potentially much more valuable investments. MVEE, properly managed, with salable product, has an opportunity to attract a lot of people to see it's films. But, going to the movies is OPTIONAL. I happen to be a big fan of Chuck Norris, Van Damme and others of the karate venue. Racetrack movies are also a kick. But, I don't go "..out to the movies.." near as often as I cook out on the gas-BarB. My investments are weighted in exact accordance with my value judgements of these issues, as yours should be - for your portfolio. If Cataldo steps up to the plate, says something significant, and backs it up with rock-hard accounting by a major player - I will re-balance my holdings toward MVEE; but not before. If one had a $1000 to invest, (..if asked..) I'd recommend $200 on MVEE, and the rest on other issues that person you feels will meet their goals. Per my previous statements, I hope you make a ton on MVEE - it works for me. If your stock goes up - so does mine! Do I trust the SOBs at this juncture; not on your Nellie..!! Regards, John :-) ps: Wouldn't it be fascinating to discover that China's major uplink to the Russian satellite network was through an Embassy in Bosnia. Perhaps a little "..oops.." by an "..errant.." smart-bomb would really piss 'em off, ..do you s'pose?!? :-) Since Embassies are not supposed to be used for overt "spying", how much do you expect to hear about it? pps: You don't really believe that Slick is in charge, do you? ;-)