SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (58608)5/18/1999 1:15:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571806
 
<Since the raw materials used to manufacture a Celeron versus a Xeon aren't significantly different in price (there is more to the Xeon in terms of mechanical parts but the Celeron has a larger die)>

Maybe you forgot about those huge chips to the side of Xeon's processor core called full-speed cache, which obviously doesn't come for free. Maybe you also forgot about electricals to make sure Xeon runs stable in a 4-way multiprocessing configuration, or the cost in making the Xeon daughtercard which has to support the full-speed L2 cache interface.

Tenchusatsu



To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (58608)5/18/1999 1:46:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 1571806
 
Kevin - Re: "And expenses/depreciation from facilities should pretty much be carried evenly over all of Intel's microprocessor product lines"

I guess that just lowers the overhead costs of the XEONS and Pentium III's !

Paul