SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Systems, Strategies and Resources for Trading Futures -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patrick Slevin who wrote (23510)5/18/1999 2:24:00 PM
From: SE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 44573
 
Do you have your fill on the open buy at 46?



To: Patrick Slevin who wrote (23510)5/18/1999 2:25:00 PM
From: Jerry Olson  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 44573
 
Just sold all shares in stocks...bought the May OEX 670 puts for a trade...i hope<g>...

no way this market holds up against this bias..no way!!!!



To: Patrick Slevin who wrote (23510)5/18/1999 2:30:00 PM
From: SE  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 44573
 
That F@#$%#$$ sell was my week. Sheesch....It sat there at 44/43 for plenty of time. No excuse not to hit it other than I simply did not want to trade in this mess.

Nuts.



To: Patrick Slevin who wrote (23510)5/18/1999 2:37:00 PM
From: Nemer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 44573
 
the long and short at the same time was done about two minutes before the announcement --- the slowed down on SI made it come out just about at the time of the plummet ....

and as one can readily tell, I definitely misread my rate of change thingie ....
really, I didn't misread it, I just depended too much on it ....
for it has now accelerated more to the down side.

Had it been a for real trade ... and surely glad that it wasn't ... I'd have bailed at 1337 and the entire trade would have been a net loss of 2 points ....
profit of 8 1/2 on closing the short from 1347.5 to 1339
loss of 10 1/2 on closing the long from 1347.5 to 1337

The 20 point move I expected looks to be better forecasted than my usage of it .....
he he