SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: djane who wrote (4715)5/19/1999 10:42:00 AM
From: djane  Respond to of 29987
 
China Telecom's Breakup Won't Help to Spur True Competition, Policy Expert Says

(5/18/99) The planned breakup at year's end of China's state-run
telecommunications monopoly, China Telecom, won't be enough to
introduce real market reforms into the industry, a speaker from a
leading Chinese policy think tank said, according to the May 17
Zhongguo Zhengquan Bao (China Securities News).

The name of the speaker, from the Economic Research Institute, was
not given in the article. The institute is a part of the powerful State
Development and Planning Commission, so his comments could be
taken as an indication of the government's policy intentions on the
telecommunications sector.

The speaker recommended allowing more of China's "specialized"
networks to compete head-to-head in the telecom market.

In the past, many government departments operated separate and
independent telecommunications networks. These specialized
networks should be allowed to compete commercially with China's
existing commercial telecom operators, such as China Telecom and
China Unicom, the country's second largest telecom provider.

The institute offered railway telecommunications department as an
example. After the China Telecom breakup, the institute floated the
idea that a new company could be formed, called the China Railway
Telecommunications Group Company.

Eventually, "when conditions are mature," the new telecom company
would be granted full operator rights, such as the right to engage in
international business transactions and import and export trade
privileges.

China Telecom's restructuring into four separate entities -- China
Landline Company, China Mobile Communications Company, China
Paging Company, and China Satellite Telecommunications Company --
will do much to level the playing field, the speaker said

But more effective competitive mechanisms would be produced if the
existing departmental networks were able to compete on a commercial
basis with the telecom giants' networks, he said.

The institute's proposals reportedly were well-received by the Ministry
of Information Industry, China's telecommunications regulatory agency.



© ChinaOnline 1999.




To: djane who wrote (4715)5/19/1999 10:52:00 AM
From: djane  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 29987
 
Nice symbolism for a new era if G* could start China service for 10/1/99 50th anniversary of PRC's founding

Wednesday May 19 1999

First spaceship one of 10
main projects

OLIVER CHOU
Ten major space test projects have been scheduled for
this year, a leading aerospace official revealed
yesterday.

They included research at the Shanghai aerospace base
on rocket and satellite development, Lu Xiaochun, party
chief of the city's Aerospace Bureau, told Liberation
Daily.

Military analysts said it was probable the launch of
China's first spaceship was one of the tasks.

Official media have reported that the Shanghai bureau
has been given the job of building parts of the spaceship,
including the capsule, in time for a launch around
October 1 to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the
founding of the People's Republic.


Mr Lu said Beijing had decided the China Aerospace
Industry General Corporation would be divided to set
up a "competition mechanism".

The reform is in line with reports that each of the five
military corporations under the Commission of Science,
Technology and Industry for National Defence would
have a new subsidiary.

Last week, Mr Lu returned from leading the Shanghai
Rocket-Satellite Experiment Group for two months on
the May 10 launch of two satellites at Taiyuan, Shanxi
province.

He told of the anger among his colleagues at the
embassy bombing. "The successful launch of our rocket
is a forceful answer to Nato's crime," he said. "The
bloody lesson teaches us that a strong defence, not just
a prosperous economy, is what makes a nation
powerful."

Copyright ©1999 South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd.
All Rights Reserved.




To: djane who wrote (4715)5/19/1999 12:16:00 PM
From: djane  Respond to of 29987
 
Perilous Times Jolt Booming Launch Market

CRAIG COVAULT/PARIS

Operational failures, soaring insurance losses, a trade clampdown
and political turmoil are hitting all at once

Internationalcommercial space launch, finance and insurance executives
meeting here said that the volatile new combination of increased failures,
fragile insurance markets and, what they view as inept U.S. policy, are
combining to create havoc in what otherwise should be the strongest
period of growth in the history of global space operations.

The good news
is that the space
launch business
should be
booming with
$45-55 billion in
new commercial
and government
unmanned space
launch
operations now
through 2007--a
2-3 fold increase
over the last
10-year period,
according to a
new assessment
by Euroconsult,
a European think
tank.

But while explosive growth in commercial satcom operations is driving
this increase, the bad news is that other equally important market factors
and government regulations are damaging that growth.

About 250 top managers from virtually every space launch company in
the world, along with key international finance and insurance managers,
were brought together by Euroconsult, for a "Space Transportation
Business Summit" to air their concerns on the situation. Global finance
and insurance is as important to commercial space as rocket fuel.

But managers at the conference said the insurance and financial sectors
have been stunned by the recent failures of spacecraft already in orbit,
launch accidents and U.S. policies that have now largely halted a free
flow of information between international space business staffs.

Approximately $300 million in claims for commercial space losses for the
first five months of 1999 are three times higher than the premiums paid to
cover such losses, said Guy Lallour, manager of international business
risk for France's AGF, the world's largest space insurance underwriter.

This compares with an almost as bad 200% insurance loss ratio for
1998, said Brigitte Vienne, vice president for finance and risk
management at Arianespace.

Individual commercial launches--such as the heaviest Ariane flights with
dual payloads--can put at risk as much as $800 million for one 20-min.
ascent to orbit, other managers said.

But, AGF figures show that the total global space insurance capacity for
the entire year, covering dozens of launches, is only about $1.3 billion.
Lallour said, however, he believes the insurance industry can cope with
the situation. Other managers here warned there is actually less space
insurance capacity available than that--meaning any more losses this year
or next will put this vital segment of the commercial space industry deeply
in the red.

And political factors also loom. The U.S. government's new export
controls and transfer of licensing from the Commerce to State
Dept.--sparked by the Chinese technology transfer controversy--are a
further setback (see p. 23).

"They are killing an entire industry with their lack of attention [to reality],"
said Robert Bednarek, executive vice president and chief technology
officer for PanAmSat. "It's making it more and more difficult to access
information, hampering competition. If we do not have access to
information, we cannot insure your projects," Lallour said.

Jean-Marie Luton, chairman and CEO of Arianespace, said, "We are
very cautious about this [policy] issue. We need information exchange to
make decisions on new projects and offers to customers."

Alexander Medvedev, first deputy general director for Russia's
Krunichev Proton operations, said he is also quite concerned, as is Liu
Zhixiong, vice president for China Great Wall Industries, which markets
the Long March--a key player in the overall controversy to begin with.

Japan's Hiroshi Imamura, vice president for Rocket System Corp., which
is marketing the H-2A, said, however, he believes "time will solve this
problem."

Wilbur Trafton, president of International Launch Services, which
markets both Atlas and Proton, had a similar view. Trafton does not
believe that the U.S. government--hearing such an uproar--will allow any
policy to stand that will damage the industry. But he is also concerned
that a Proton quota--to kick in late this year--be amended.

The loss in just the last year of two Delta IIIs and their payloads, a Zenit
carrying 12 Globalstars, an Athena and its Ikonos satellite along with
three U.S. Air Force Titan IV missions, illustrates the launcher problem
(AW&ST May 3, p. 31; May 10, p. 28).

But there has also been "a drastic increase of in-orbit failures," according
to data compiled by Philippe Montpert, managing director of Paris-based
Aon, the world's largest wholesale insurance brokerage firm. That
represents a shift in the commercial communications satellite industry
requiring operators to think in terms of more total reliability beyond the
launch vehicle, Bednarek said.

The insurance, policy and hardware failure issues all influence the
financing picture. And financing is becoming increasingly hard to get,
especially for startup launch enterprises. This will force a greater blending
of financial and insurance arrangements, managers said.

The recent collapse of the high-yield debt market and the Asian
economic crisis have greatly reduced the money available for commercial
space investment, said George Mueller, chief executive officer for Kistler
Aerospace Corp.

The deep financial troubles of the Motorola Iridium program are also
severe enough to be influencing the entire space investment picture,
several managers said.

The total commercial space financing needed through 1999 is about
$750 million, said Mathis H. Shinnick, managing director for banking and
corporate finance at Chase Securities. But only about $450 million of that
has been raised to date, he said. Companies like Kistler, Sea Launch,
Rotary Rocket and Kelley Aerospace are all vying for investment, but
obtaining the money will be difficult because "capital markets are yet to
finance any standalone launch providers," Shinnick said.

One exception may be Sea Launch, however. The company's successful
first Zenit launch on Mar. 28 may allow it to go to the market soon for
nonrecourse financing, he said, adding that he believes such financing in
which assets are less at risk, would be unprecedented for a commercial
space project.

Sea Launch is dealing with the pullout of their Norwegian partner,
Kvaener, as a result of financial problems in the firm. The recent string of
failures--both with operational satellites already aloft and missions during
launch--are also having a significant effect on the overall
telecommunications market's perception of space.

"When we talk to our customers [in the telecommunications industry]
there is a growing belief that commercial communications satellites are
unreliable--that satellites and boosters are failing--and that these are 'very
visible failures,'" Bednarek said. "We must broaden customers'
perspectives" on the nature of this business, he told the forum. He is in a
strong position to know--PanAmSat is operating 19 spacecraft.

The major U.S. government and industry reviews sparked by the string
of accidents should result in "increased reliability across the board," said
Trafton of ILS. J. David Schweikle, general manager of Boeing's Delta
Launch Services Div., which has suffered two Delta III failures in a row,
agreed, but said a lot will depend upon the specific causes found for each
accident and how that influences processes down the chain from prime
contractors to component suppliers. Delta managers are looking at the
possibility that a gear failed in the pump of a Pratt & Whitney RL10B-2
engine in the May 4 Delta III mission failure.

Andrew Beal, president of Beal Aerospace Technologies, which is
developing a large new expendable, said the accidents and reviews "will
make it harder" for new firms like his to break into commercial
operations. There will be a premium placed on performance and
demonstrated reliability. "I think the world is skeptical of just talk," Beal
said. He noted his own program plans to make at least two flight test
launches without payloads to prove his booster's performance and
reliability.

© May 17, 1999 The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.



To: djane who wrote (4715)5/19/1999 12:19:00 PM
From: djane  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 29987
 
Motorola Wavering on Teledesic?

updated 7:30 a.m. 19.May.99.PDT

by Joanna Glasner

3:00 a.m. 19.May.99.PDT
Teledesic, a US$9 billion satellite network
that's scheduled to be in operation in
2003, is facing a snag in its plans to build
a broadband "Internet in the sky."

The company's main contractor,
Motorola, still hasn't signed a contract to
build the satellite system after about a
year of negotiations.

Last week, Motorola (MOT) told several
subcontractors to stop working -- at
least temporarily -- until contract
negotiations end. The company also
moved some workers on the project to
other areas and eliminated some
temporary positions.

The move was a "a small, internal
realignment," carried out so that Motorola
would focus on other areas of the
telecommunications business, said Robert
Edwards, a spokesman for Motorola's
satellite telecommunications group.

Satellite industry executives, however,
saw the move as a sign that Motorola
may be wavering in its commitment to the
Teledesic project.

"Everybody in this industry is gun-shy at
the moment," said Alden Richards of
Space Machine Advisors, which sells
insurance to satellite companies.

Motorola's last big satellite venture -- the
$5 billion Iridium phone network -- has
generated huge losses for the company.
Meanwhile, shares of most satellite
companies have been suffering on Wall
Street, dampening investor enthusiasm
for another satellite venture.

In addition, the US launch industry is in
crisis. In the past year, several rockets
have exploded or failed to put expensive
satellites in the correct orbits, raising
concerns that upcoming satellite projects
will have bigger-than-expected losses.

Teledesic, founded by Bill Gates and
cellular-phone mogul Craig McCaw, plans
to put 288 satellites in low-earth orbit to
transmit data at speeds up to 2,000
times the speed of a dialup modem.

The disappointing performance of Iridium's
business shouldn't affect the broadband
network's ability to make money.
Although both projects involve networks
of low-earth satellites, Teledesic's
business plan doesn't have much in
common with Iridium, said Roger Nyhus, a
company spokesman.

Teledesic said that its system will be able
to support a few million simultaneous
users. The company expects most of its
money to come from business customers
who need high-speed Internet access in
suburban or rural areas or in developing
countries.

But building the satellite system will take
longer than Teledesic expected. The
company now says that it plans to launch
commercial service in late 2003 instead of
its original launch date of 2002.


And Teledesic won't be beaming
broadband to anyone unless it hammers
out an agreement with Motorola, which is
a key investor as well as a contractor.
The last time Teledesic disclosed the
level of participation from its main
investors, Motorola was still the biggest
stakeholder, with a 26 percent share of
the venture.

"I don't think they're skittish about the
satellite project, but they don't want to
have the same amount of risk that they
have with the Iridium project," said Luke
Szymczak, an analyst with Prudential
Securities.

Even if Motorola backed out, Teledesic
would still have a lot of big-name
backers. McCaw and Gates each own 21
percent of the venture. Billionaire investor
Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal has 11 percent,
and Boeing is in for 4 percent.

Neither Teledesic nor Motorola set a date
for when they expect to sign the
contract. Industry watchers said that it
makes sense for Motorola to take its
time.

"They've got to be nervous as hell,"
Richards said. "They're thinking, 'Do I
really want to get into another
multibillion-dollar satellite system?'"

Copyright © 1994-99 Wired Digital Inc. All rights
reserved.